Fiber Composition of Packaging Grade Papers as determined by the Graff "C" Staining Test
Keywords:Fiber analysis, Graff "C" stain, chemical pulp, semi-chemical pulp, mechanical pulp, recycled fibers, packaging
AbstractA qualitative and quantitative analysis of the fiber components of 15 representative papers that are used for the production of corrugated board was carried out by the Graff "C" staining test. The method of processing of softwood, hardwood, and nonwood fibers was determined under a light microscope by their color reactions with the stain. All papers, due to the use of recycled pulp raw materials in their manufacturing, were found to incorporate in their furnish fibers that had been produced with a variety of pulping processes: chemical, mechanical, and semi-mechanical. The recycled-based papers (recycled-liner and recycled-medium) were proved to be the most variable comprising 12-15 different fiber components, while in some of the semi-chemicals only up to 7 components were identified. The weight percentages of the fiber components calculated by the application of weight factors showed that in almost all papers the most important fiber component from a quantitative standpoint was hardwood unbleached kraft followed by softwood unbleached kraft. Besides hardwood unbleached semi-chemical pulp and mechanical softwood pulp that were also plentiful in the papers, there was a smaller number of other components which sum, however, accounted for a significant fraction in the total furnish weight. The results taken on the total softwood, hardwood, and nonwood fibers content of the papers demonstrate that Graff "C" staining test is adequate to analyze both the structure and quality of packaging grade papers in practical industrial testing.
Bormett, D. W., D. J. Fahey, and J. F. Laundrie. 1981. Use of oak in linerboards. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-410. For. Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nBritt, K. W. 1971. Handbook of pulp and paper technology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.nCEPI-Confederation of European Paper Industries. 2003. CEPI Annual Report. Brussels, Belgium.nClark, J. d'A. 1951. Notes on weight factors for fiber microscopy. Tappi34(7):317-318.nDrost, C., Y. Ni, and D. Schewchuk. 2004. Effect of increased jack pine content on kraft pulp properties. Tappi3(1):23-25.nFAO. 2001. Global forest resources assessment 2000 main report. FAO Forestry Paper 140, Rome, Italy.nGarcía, J. A. 1988. Constituentes fibrosos de pastas y papeles. Universitat Politécnica de Cataluna, Terrassa, España.nGraff, J. H. 1940. Weight factors of beaten pulps. Paper Trade J.110(2):37-40.nHoward, R. C., and W. Bichard. 1992. The basic effects of recycling on pulp properties. J. Pulp and Paper Sci.18(4):J151.nInce, P. J. 2004. Fiber resources. Pages 877-883 in J. Burley, J. Evans, and J. A. Youngquist, eds. Encyclopedia of forest sciences, Vol. 2. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, UK.nIsenberg, I. H. 1958. Pulp and paper microscopy, 3rd ed. Institute of Paper Chemistry, Appleton, WI.nISO Standard (1990) 9184-1. Paper, board and pulps. Fiber furnish analysis. Part 1: General method.nISO Standard (1990) 9184-2. Paper, board and pulps. Fiber furnish analysis. Part 2: Staining guide.nISO Standard (1990) 9184-4. Paper, board and pulps. Fiber furnish analysis. Part 4: Graff "C" staining test.nISO Standard (1994) 9184-7. Paper, board and pulps. Fiber furnish analysis. Part 7: Determination of weight factor.nLaw, K. N., J. L. Valade, and J. Quan. 1996. Effects of recycling on papermaking properties of mechanical and high yield pulps. Part I: Hardwood pulps. Tappi79(3): 167-174.nMabee, W. 1998. The importance of recovered fibers in global fiber supply. Unasylva49(193).nMarkström, H. 1988. Testing methods and instruments for corrugated board, 3rd ed. Lorentzen & Wettre, Kista, Sweden.nMohlin, U. B. 1989. Fiber bonding ability—A key pulp quality parameter for mechanical pulps to be used in printing papers. Pages 49-57 in Proc. International Mechanical Pulping Conference. Helsinki, Finland.nParham, R. A., and R. L. Gray. 1990. The practical identification of wood pulp fibers, 2nd ed. Tappi Press, Atlanta, GA.nSkog, K. E., P. J. Ince, and R. W. Haynes. 1998. Wood fiber supply and demand in the United States. Proc. Forest Products Society Annual Meeting. Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.nSpearing, W. E., and R. C. Dressler. 1954. A stain technique for differentiating hardwood and softwood mechanical pulps. Tappi37(1):39-42.nStrelis, I., and R. W. Kennedy. 1967. Identification of North American commercial pulpwoods and pulp fibers. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.nThomas, R. J., and R. C. Kellison. 1990. Impact of changing raw material on paper manufacturing and properties. Pages 33-46 in Proc. South Plantations Wood Quality Workshop. Athens, GA.nYoung, R. A. 1997. Processing of agro-based resources into pulp and paper. Pages 137-245 in R. M. Rowell, R. A. Young, and J. K. Rowell, eds. Paper and composites from agro-based resources. CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.