Wood Use in Nonresidential Construction: An Exploratory Research of the Roles of Media and Content in Direct Marketing
Keywords:Architects, nonresidential construction, communications, product information, brands
AbstractThe purposes of this research were to explore the role of selected marketing communications on the perceived identity of wood among architects and to define informational needs left unaddressed by those communications. The research was based on an experimental design implemented among architects designing nonresidential structures in the United States. The perceived identity of wood used structurally, using concepts from the branding literature, was not altered by any of the three stimuli (brochures categorized as Advertising, Case Study, and Technical Data). The case study was deemed more influential than the technical brochure with the advertisement ranking in between. Important informational needs identified related to design possibilities, regulations and standards, environmental footprints, and sustainable design. However, it must be noted that the experiment was limited temporally. It covered only one type of communications, although this type is the most common. Research results imply that the development of the nonresidential market should involve a long-term strategic commitment as opposed to a "quick fix" in the form of an advertising campaign.
Aaker JL (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. J Marketing Res XXXIV:347-356.nAnantachart S (2004) Integrated marketing communications and market planning: Their implications to brand equity building. J Promot Manage 11(1):101-125.nArmstrong J, Overton T (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Marketing Res XIV(August):396-402.nAshby M, Johnson K (2002) Materials and design: The art and science of material selection in product design. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. 336 pp.nBlombäck A (2005) Supplier brand image: A catalyst for choice. Thesis dissertation, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping, Sweden. 360 pp.nBysheim K, Nyrud AQ (2010) Norwegian architects' and civil engineers' attitudes to wood in urban construction. The future of quality control for wood and wood products. Edinburgh, UK. COST Action E53.nCampbell MC, Keller KL (2003) Brand familiarity and advertising repetition. J Consum Res 30:292-304.nChurchill GA, Iacobucci D (2002) Marketing research: Methodological foundations. South-Western/Thomson Learning, Mason, OH. 1006 pp.nCouvelaere V, Richelieu A (2005) Brand strategy in professional sports: The case of french soccer teams. Eur Sport Manag Q 5(1):23-46.nCramphorn S (2006) How to use advertising to build brands: In search of the philosopher's stone. Int J Market Res 48(3):255-276.nCurtin R, Presser S, Singer E (2000) The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opin Quart 64:413-428.nCurtin R, Presser S, Singer E (2005) Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the pas quarter century. Public Opin Quart 69:87-98.nde Leeuw E, de Heer W (2002) Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. Pages 41-54 in RM Groves, DA Dillman, JL Eltinge, and RJA Little, eds. Survey nonresponse. Wiley, New York, NY.nDillman DA (1999) Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.nDunkelberg W, Day G (1973) Nonresponse bias and call-backs in sample surveys. J Marketing Res 10:160-168.nForeman S (2004) Marketing: Integrated communications, advertising effectiveness and brand equity. Manager Update 15(3):13-22.nFranke GR, Huhmann BA, Mothersbaugh DL (2004) Information content and consumer readership of print ads: A comparison of search and experience products. J Academy of Marketing Sci 32(1):20-31.nGaston C, Kozak R, O'Connor J, Fell D (2001) Potential for increased eood-use in North American nonresidential markets. Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, Canada. 106 pp.nGriffin E (2003) A first look at communication theory. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, NY. 518 pp.nGroves RM (2006) Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Quart 70 (5):646-675.nGroves RM, Wissoker D (1999) Early nonresponse studies of the 1997 national survey of America's families. Assessing the New Federalism. Urban Institute, Washington, DC. 155 pp.nGuo X, Johnson WD (1996) Sample sizes for experiments with multivariate measures. J Biopharm Stat 6(2): 155-176.nHanssens DM, Weitz BA (1980) The effectiveness of industrial print advertisements across product categories. J Marketing Res 17:294-306.nKapferer J (2004) The new strategic brand management. 3rd ed. Kogan, London, UK. 497 pp.nKeller KL (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. J Marketing 57(January): 1-22.nKozak RA, Cohen DH (1997) How specifiers learn about structural materials. Wood Fiber Sci 29(4):381-396.nKozak RA, Cohen DH (1999) Architects and structural engineers: An examination of wood design and use in nonresidential construction. Forest Prod J 49(4):37-46.nKrishnamurthy S (2001) Person-to-person marketing: The emergence of the new consumer web. University of Washington, Report, Seattle, WA. 43 pp.nLambin J-J, Chumpitaz R (2002) Marketing Stratégique et Opérationnel. Dunod, Paris, France. 518 pp.nLenth RV (2001) Some practical guidelines for effective sample-size determination. Am Stat 55(3):187-193.nLewi G (2005) Branding management: The brand from idea to action [in French]. Pearson Education France, Paris, France. 496 pp.nLilien GL, Rangaswamy A (2002) Marketing engineering: Computer-assisted marketing analysis and planning. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 518 pp.nLin I-F, Schaeffer N (1995) Using survey participants to estimate the impact of non-participation. Public Opin Quart 59:236-258.nLodish LM (1986) The advertising and promotion challenge. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 188 pp.nO'Connor J, Fell D, Kozak R (2004) Potential for increased wood-used in North American nonresidential markets—Part II (builder/owner survey). Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, Canada. 90 pp.nPetty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J Consum Res 10(2):135-146.nRobichaud F, Kozak RA, Richelieu A (2009) Wood use in nonresidential construction: A case for communications with architects. Forest Prod J 59(1/2):1-9.nRochon J (1991) Sample size calculations for two-group repeated-measures experiments. Biometrics 47(December): 1383-1398.nRoos A, Woxblom L, McCluskey DR (2008) Architects', and building engineers', and stakeholders' perceptions to wood in construction—Results from a qualitative study. Pages 184-194 in Proc. Even Bergseng, Grethe Delbeck and Hans Fredrik Hoen, eds. Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics Lom, Norway, 6-9 April, 2008, Scandinavian Forest Economics 42.nRossiter JR, Percy L (1997) Advertising communications and promotion management. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 672 pp.nSchultz DE, Schultz HF (2004) IMC—The next generation: Five steps for delivering and measuring returns using marketing communication. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 408 pp.nThorpe SW (2002) Online student evaluation of instruction: An investigation of non-response rate. Proc 42nd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Canada. 10 pp.nTöllner A, Lentz P (2008) Industrial brand personality: Transferring an existing concept into a new market. European Marketing Academy Conference, Brighton, UK. European Marketing Academy, Brussels, Belgium. 7 pp.nUnderwood D, Heather K, Matier M (2000) Comparisons of survey response rates and respondent characteristics. Proc 40th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH, Association for Institutional Research, Tallahassee, FL. 21 pp.nVonesh EF, Schork MA (1986) Sample sizes in the multivariate analysis of repeated measurements. Biometrics 42 (September):601-610.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.