Acoustic Emission Associated with Oak During Drying


  • Stephen L. Quarles


Acoustic emission, drying, drying defects, surface checking


Time-domain acoustic emission (AE) parameters were monitored during the drying of 25- and 50-mm-thick California black oak (Quercus kelloggii). Consistent drying conditions (82 C dry bulb temperature/43 C wet bulb temperature) were used throughout the experiment, and an AET 5500 acoustic emission monitoring system was used to monitor AE activity. AE event rates for both thicknesses were similar, with approximately 90% of all activity occurring during the initial 15 to 20 hours of drying, when the average moisture content was still above 50% (oven-dry basis). Active propagation of surface checks was consistently associated with the occurrence of an increasing number of high amplitude events (i.e., those between 60 and 79 dB), although nonvisible micro-failures could have been associated with the large number of lower amplitude events. The high amplitude events typically comprised less than 1% of all events occurring during a given run. Surface-mounted transducers did not detect AE associated with the internal checking that occurred in all test samples.


Becker, H. F. 1982. Acoustic emissions during wood drying. Holz Roh Werkst. 40(9):345-350 (German).nHoneycutt, R. M., C. Skaar, and W. T. Simpson. 1985. Use of acoustic emissions to control drying rate of red oak. Forest Prod. J. 35(1):48-50.nKagawa, Y., M. Noouchi, and J. Katagiri. 1980. Detection of acoustic emissions in the process of timber drying. Acoustic Letters 3(8): 150-153.nMichalski, G. V. 1983. An analysis of end check damage in red oak boards in relation to acoustic emission count rate/stress wave factor. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. 135 pp.nMilburn, J. A. 1973. Cavitation studies on whole Ricinus plants by acoustic emission detection. Planta 112(4): 333-342.nNoguchi, M., Y. Kagawa, and J. Katagiri. 1980. Detection of acoustic emissions during hardwood drying. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 26(9):637-638.nNoguchi, M., Y. Kagawa, and J. Katagiri. 1983. Acoustic emission generation in the process of drying hardwoods. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 29(1):20-23 (Japanese).nNoguchi, M., S. Okumura, and S. Kawamoto. 1985. Characteristics of acoustic emissions during wood drying. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 31(3): 171-175.nNoguchi, M., S. Kitayama, K. Satoyoshi, and J. Umetsu. 1987. Feedback control for drying Zelkova serrata using in-process acoustic emission monitoring. Forest Prod. J. 37(1):28-34.nOgino, S., K. Kaino, and M. Suzuki. 1986. Prediction of lumber checking during drying by means of acoustic emission technique. J. Acoustic Emission 5(2):61-65.nQuarles, S. L. 1990. Acoustic emission during drying. Proceedings Western Dry Kiln Association. Pages 51-60.nQuarles, S. L., and L. Zhou. 1987. Use of acoustic emission to detect drying defects: a preliminary report. Pages 95-111 in Proceedings/Sixth Nondestructive Testing of Wood Symposium. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nSadanari, M., and S. Kitayama. 1989. Waveform analysis of acoustic emissions generated in the wood drying process. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 35(7):602-608 (Japanese).nSkaar, C., W. T. Simpson, and R. M. Honeycutt. 1980. Use of acoustic emissions to identify high levels of stress during oak lumber drying. Forest Prod. J. 30(2):21-22.nTyree, M. T., and M. A. Dixon. 1983. Cavitation events in Thuja occidentalisL. Plant Physiology 72(4): 1094-1099.nWassipaul, F., M. Vanek, and A. Mayrhofer. 1986. Klima und schallemissionen bei der holztrocknung. Holzforchung und Holzverwertung 38(4):73-79.n






Research Contributions