A Perceptional Comparison of Wood in Separate Infrastructure Markets
Keywords:Perceptions, wood, infrastructure materials, material attributes
AbstractPerceptions of wood as an infrastructure material were investigated within four distinct market segments and within five geographic regions of the United States. Wood was compared to steel, reinforced and prestressed concrete, aluminum, and plastic on six predetermined factor groups and by thirty material attributes. The foremost factors in material choice decisions were durability, maintenance, and cost. All infrastructure groups rated wood lower in overall material performance as compared to prestressed and reinforced concrete, steel, and aluminum. Only plastic was rated lower than wood in perceived material performance.
Anonymous. 1987. Steel tie activity increasing. Railway Track and Structures 81(5):37.nAmerican Consulting Engineers Council. (ACEC). 1995. American consulting engineers council 1995-96 directory. ACEC, 1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Suite 802. Washington, DC, CD-ROM version.nArmstrong. J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(8):396-402.nBallenger, J. K., and S. K. McCune. 1990. A procedure for determining sample size for multiple population parameter studies. J. Marketing Ed. 12(3):30-33.nBuckett. J., D. Firth, and J. R. Surtees. 1987. Concrete ties in modern track. Railway Track and Structures. V 83(9):32-37.nCordova, B. 1995. Personal Communication, American Pulpwood Association Representative, Houston, TX. June 6.nDillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone survey methods—The total design method. John Wiley & Sons, New York. NY. Pp. 160-198.nMicklewright, J. T. 1994. Wood preservation statistics, 1993. American Wood-Preservers Association. Stevens-ville, MD. 9 pp.nNational Association of County Engineers. (NACE) 1995. National association of county engineers membership directory, 1995-1996. National Association of County Engineers, 440 First Street, N.W., Washington, DC. 244 pp.nNational Transportation Strategic Planning Study. 1991. Congressional Information Service.nNg. H. 1994. Wood Technology Research Program of the Electric Power Research Institute. Proc. First Southeastern Pole Conference. Wood Society. Madison, WI. Number 7314, pp. 13-18.nPinchin, B. A. 1995. Ports of the world. Lloyd's of London Press. Ltd. Clochester, Essex CO-33-LP, United Kingdom.nPowell. D. S., J. L. Faulkner, D. R. Darr, Z. Zhu. and D. W. MacCleery. 1993. Forest Resources of the United States. 1992. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-234.nRTA-Railway The Association. 1986. Wooden crossties: The proven performer. St. Louis, MO. 20 pp.nRTA-Railway The Association. Methods of multivariate analysis John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY p 626nReynolds, G. R. 1994. Realities in wood crosstie production: Today and tomorrow. Crossties, November/December 1994.nSchneider, T., Exec. Ed., and H. Roth, Vice President/ Editorial Director. 1996. The Official Railway Guide. Volume 129, Number 2.nSchwieger, R., Group Editorial Director, and A. T. Hayes, Manager. 1995. Directory of Electric Power Producers, 1996. 104th edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies. New York, NY.nSmith, R. L. and R. J. Bush. 1995. A perceptional investigation into the adoption of timber bridges. Wood Fiber Sci. V 27(2)141-154.nSmith, R. L., R. J. Bush, and S. A. Bowe. 1999. A perceptional investigation into the adoption of timber bridges: A national comparative study. Wood Fiber Sci. Volume 31(2):204-216.nU.S. Department of Agriculture—Office of Transportation. 1989. Rural bridges: An assessment based on the national timber bridge inventory. Transportation Report, Washington, DC. 5 pp.nU.S. Department of Defense. Army Corps of Engineers. 1996. Army Corps of Engineers 1996 Directory. Washington, DC.nU.S. Department of Defense. Government Printing Office. 1996. Department of Defense Telephone Directory. Washington, DC, April.nU.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. 1992. National bridge inventory data. Washington, DC. 6 pp.nU.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. 1993. Highway statistics 1992: Highway excellence—100 years and beyond. Washington, DC. 1993. 140 pp.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.