A Perceptional Comparison of Wood in Separate Infrastructure Markets

Authors

  • Robert L. Smith
  • Warren E. Spradlin
  • Delton R. Alderman
  • Edward Cesa

Keywords:

Perceptions, wood, infrastructure materials, material attributes

Abstract

Perceptions of wood as an infrastructure material were investigated within four distinct market segments and within five geographic regions of the United States. Wood was compared to steel, reinforced and prestressed concrete, aluminum, and plastic on six predetermined factor groups and by thirty material attributes. The foremost factors in material choice decisions were durability, maintenance, and cost. All infrastructure groups rated wood lower in overall material performance as compared to prestressed and reinforced concrete, steel, and aluminum. Only plastic was rated lower than wood in perceived material performance.

References

Anonymous. 1987. Steel tie activity increasing. Railway Track and Structures 81(5):37.nAmerican Consulting Engineers Council. (ACEC). 1995. American consulting engineers council 1995-96 directory. ACEC, 1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Suite 802. Washington, DC, CD-ROM version.nArmstrong. J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(8):396-402.nBallenger, J. K., and S. K. McCune. 1990. A procedure for determining sample size for multiple population parameter studies. J. Marketing Ed. 12(3):30-33.nBuckett. J., D. Firth, and J. R. Surtees. 1987. Concrete ties in modern track. Railway Track and Structures. V 83(9):32-37.nCordova, B. 1995. Personal Communication, American Pulpwood Association Representative, Houston, TX. June 6.nDillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone survey methods—The total design method. John Wiley & Sons, New York. NY. Pp. 160-198.nMicklewright, J. T. 1994. Wood preservation statistics, 1993. American Wood-Preservers Association. Stevens-ville, MD. 9 pp.nNational Association of County Engineers. (NACE) 1995. National association of county engineers membership directory, 1995-1996. National Association of County Engineers, 440 First Street, N.W., Washington, DC. 244 pp.nNational Transportation Strategic Planning Study. 1991. Congressional Information Service.nNg. H. 1994. Wood Technology Research Program of the Electric Power Research Institute. Proc. First Southeastern Pole Conference. Wood Society. Madison, WI. Number 7314, pp. 13-18.nPinchin, B. A. 1995. Ports of the world. Lloyd's of London Press. Ltd. Clochester, Essex CO-33-LP, United Kingdom.nPowell. D. S., J. L. Faulkner, D. R. Darr, Z. Zhu. and D. W. MacCleery. 1993. Forest Resources of the United States. 1992. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-234.nRTA-Railway The Association. 1986. Wooden crossties: The proven performer. St. Louis, MO. 20 pp.nRTA-Railway The Association. Methods of multivariate analysis John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY p 626nReynolds, G. R. 1994. Realities in wood crosstie production: Today and tomorrow. Crossties, November/December 1994.nSchneider, T., Exec. Ed., and H. Roth, Vice President/ Editorial Director. 1996. The Official Railway Guide. Volume 129, Number 2.nSchwieger, R., Group Editorial Director, and A. T. Hayes, Manager. 1995. Directory of Electric Power Producers, 1996. 104th edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies. New York, NY.nSmith, R. L. and R. J. Bush. 1995. A perceptional investigation into the adoption of timber bridges. Wood Fiber Sci. V 27(2)141-154.nSmith, R. L., R. J. Bush, and S. A. Bowe. 1999. A perceptional investigation into the adoption of timber bridges: A national comparative study. Wood Fiber Sci. Volume 31(2):204-216.nU.S. Department of Agriculture—Office of Transportation. 1989. Rural bridges: An assessment based on the national timber bridge inventory. Transportation Report, Washington, DC. 5 pp.nU.S. Department of Defense. Army Corps of Engineers. 1996. Army Corps of Engineers 1996 Directory. Washington, DC.nU.S. Department of Defense. Government Printing Office. 1996. Department of Defense Telephone Directory. Washington, DC, April.nU.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. 1992. National bridge inventory data. Washington, DC. 6 pp.nU.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. 1993. Highway statistics 1992: Highway excellence—100 years and beyond. Washington, DC. 1993. 140 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-19

Issue

Section

Research Contributions