Effects of Knife Jointing and Wear on The Planed Surface Quality of Sugar Maple Wood

Authors

  • Roger E. Hernández
  • Gerson Rojas

Keywords:

Planing, knife jointing, wear, gluing properties, sugar maple

Abstract

Jointing is a common practice required to produce the same cutting circle for all knives mounted in a cutterhead of a peripheral knife planer. Initially the jointed land at the cutting edge has a 0 degree clearance angle, which becomes negative with the workpiece motion relative to the cutterhead and as the cutting edge wears. Jointed knives could crush a thin layer of the planed board and affect the wood quality and performance. Sugar maple wood gluing properties were evaluated in samples that had been planed using one of four jointed land widths, each tested at four states of wear. With increased jointed land and planing length, the damage to the surface and subsurface of wood increased, but the gluing strength and percent wood failure decreased. The depth of this damaged layer was positively correlated with the magnitude of the normal cutting force. In samples where moisture content had fluctuated, the effects of jointing and wear on gluing were more pronounced. The results suggest that a jointed land of 0.9 mm may be used as maximum allowable width for planing sugar maple wood. Also, the planed surface quality of this wood may be negatively affected using a knife with 45 μm of rake face recession and 60 μm of clearance face recession, which results in a damaged layer 0.20 mm thick.

References

Ali, R., M. Komatsu, and S. Ahmad. 1990. Planing process of Malaysian timbers II. Mechanical evaluation of high speed steel (HSS) knife edge wear in planing some Malaysian timbers. J. Tropical Forest Sci. 4(1):7-14.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1987a. Standard test method for strength properties of adhesive bonds in shear by compression loading. ASTM D 905. Philadelphia, PA.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1987b. Standard methods for conducting machining tests of wood and wood base materials. ASTM D 1666. Philadelphia, PA.nDavis, E.M. 1942. Machining and related characteristics of southern hardwoods. Tech. Bull N° 824, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.nDunsmore, F.L. 1965. The technique of woodworking machinery. MacDonald, London, UK. 173 pp.nEdvardsen, K. 1993. A method to study the quality of planed surfaces and its influence on glue line strength. Page 495 in Proc. Eleventh International Wood Machining Seminar, Honne, Norway.nHernández, R.E. 1994. Effect of two wood surfacing methods on the gluing properties of sugar maple and white spruce. Forest Prod. J. 44(7/8):63-66.nHernández, R.E., and N. Naderi. 2001. Effect of knife jointing on the gluing properties of wood. Wood Fiber Sci. 33(2): 292-301.nHoadley, R.B. 2000. Understanding wood. A craftsman's guide to wood technology. The Taunton Press, New-town, CT. 280 pp.nHordern, R.H. 1958. Woodworking machinist, vol I. Cax-ton, London, UK. 327 pp.nHuang, Y.-S. 1994. Cutting force components in orthogonal cutting parallel to the grain (90-0). II. Effects of feed lengths. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 40(10):1059-1066.nJokerst, R.W., and H.A. Stewart. 1976. Knife-versus abrasive-planed wood: Quality of adhesive bonds. Wood Fiber 8(2): 107-113.nJones, C.W. 1994. Cutterheads and knives for machining wood. C. W. Jones Publ., Seattle, WA. 138 pp.nKing, B., and R.O. Foschi. 1969. Crossed-ring dynamometer for direct force resolution into three orthogonal components. Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 9:345-356.nKirbach, E., and T. Bonac. 1977. Cutting unseasoned western red cedar with titanium carbide-coated, carbide-tipped saws. Pages 15-32 in Proc. Fifth International Wood Machining Seminar, Richmond, CA.nKirbach, E., and T. Bonac. 1982. Alloy tipping for reduced sawtooth dulling. Forest Prod. J. 32(8):36-40.nMcKenzie, W.M. 1960. Fundamental aspects of the wood cutting process. Forest Prod. J. 10(9):447-456.nMurmanis, L., B.H. River, and H.A. Stewart. 1983. Microscopy of abrasive-planed and knife-planed surfaces in wood-adhesive bonds. Wood Fiber Sci. 15(2):102-115.nMurmanis, L., B.H. River, and H.A. Stewart. 1986. Surface and subsurface characteristics related to abrasive-planing conditions. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(1): 107-117.nReeb, J.E., J.J. Karchesy, J.R. Foster, and R.L. Krahmer. 1998. Finger-joint quality after 4, 6, and 32 hours of knife wear: Preliminary results. Forest Prod. J. 48(7/8):33-36.nRiver, B.H., and V.P. Miniutti. 1975. Surface damage before gluing-weak joints. Wood and Wood Prod. 80(7): 35-36,38.nSas Institute. 1988. Sas/Stat Users Guide, Release 6.03 Ed. Sas Institute, Inc., Gary, NC.nStewart, H.A. 1977. Optimum rake angle related to selected strength properties of wood. Forest Prod. J. 27(1): 51-53.nStewart, H.A. 1988. Analysis of tool forces and edge recession after cutting medium-density fiberboard. Pages 320-341 in Proc. Ninth International Wood Machining Seminar, Richmond, CA.nStewart, H.A. 1989. Feasible high-temperature phenomena in tool wear from wood machining. Forest Prod. J. 39(3): 25-28.nStewart, H.A. 1991. A comparison of tool materials, coatings, and treatments related to tool wear during wood machining. Forest Prod. J. 41(9):61-64.nStewart, H.A. and J.B. Crist. 1982. SEM examination of subsurface damage of wood after abrasive and knife planing. Wood Sci. 14(3): 106-109.nTanaka, C. 1985. Tool wear of wood cutting tools made of five different materials. Pages 86-98 in Proc. Eighth International Wood Machining Seminar, Richmond, CA.nWengert, G. 1988. The wood doctor's Rx. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Blacksburg, VA. 378 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions