Finite Element Analysis of Moso Bamboo-Reinforced Southern Pine Osb Composite Beams
Keywords:Finite element analysis, experimental bending test, bamboo-OSB composite beam, flexural behavior, stress distributions
AbstractA finite element (FE) analysis was performed to investigate the flexural properties of a structural composite lumber—Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) reinforced southern pine oriented strand-board (OSB). Parametric analyses were conducted to investigate the stress and displacement distributions. Various beam configurations as affected by glue, web structure, flange composition, and bamboo-OSB combination were considered. The comparison of the numerical results from the selected models with those from bending tests was also performed. Finally, a rational design criterion for this type of composite beam was proposed based on the analytical and experimental studies. Bamboo is capable of improving the flexural properties of the OSB for use as a structural beam or joist. At a given cross section of about 30 X 140 mm, for instance, two-layer (6.4-mm thickness each) laminated bamboo flange can increase the OSB beam's maximum bending stress by 60 to 70% and double its stiffness. The total flange thickness, rather than the thickness of each layer, controls the beam deflection while the flange with a thinner layer (3.2 mm) resulted in higher bending, vertical, and transverse stresses but lower in-plane shear stress. More reinforcing material in the composite beam could reduce the maximum bending stress but would likely increase beam weight and processing cost. From this study, it is suggested that a two-layer flanged composite beam would be favorable from a material processing standpoint as well as superior in engineering performance over other configurations of bamboo-OSB composite beam product.
Adamson, W. C, G. A. White, H. T. DeRigo, and W. O. Hawhey. 1978. Bamboo production research at Savannah, Georgia, 1956-1977. Research Report, ASR-S-176, USDA Agricultural Research Service.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1994. Standard methods of static tests of timbers in structural sizes. ASTM D-198, Philadelphia, PA.nBai, X. S. 1996. Experimental and numerical evaluations of structural wood/bamboo composite materials. Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 154 pp.nBulleit, W. M., L. B. Sandberg, and G. J. Woods. 1989. Steel-reinforced glued laminated timber. J. Struct. Eng. 115(2):443-445.nDavalos, J. F., J. F. Barbero, U. Munipalla, and H. A. Salim. 1993. Interfacial bond strength of laminated wood-fiber reinforced plastics composite beams. Pages 771-781 in Proc. 25th International SAMPE Technical Conference, Philadelphia, PA.nFawcett, R., and R. L. Sack. 1977. Evaluation of shear web ply orientation for wood I-beams. J. Struct. Div. ASCE 103(ST3):635-647.nGlenn, H. E. 1956. Seasoning, preservative and water-repellent treatment and physical property studies of bamboo. Bulletin No. 8, Engineering Experiment Station, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.nKoenigshof, G. A. 1986. Strength and stiffness of composite floor joists. Forest Prod. J. 36(9):66-70.nLee, A. W. C, X. S. Bai, and P. N. Peralta. 1994. Selected physical and mechanical properties of Moso bamboo grown in South Carolina. Forest Prod. J 44(9):40-46.nLee, A. W. C, X. S. Bai, and A. P. Bange. 1997. Flexual properties of bamboo-reinforced southern pine OSB beams. Forest Prod. J 47(6):74-78.nLeichti, R. J., and C. H. Yoo. 1992. Straight, single-tapered composite I-beams of orthotropic materials. J. Mater. Civil Eng., ASCE 4(4):399-414.nStructural Dynamics Research Corporation (SDRC). 1994. I-DEAS™ User's Guide. Milford, OH.nTriche, M. H. 1988. Finite element modeling of a parallel aligned wood strand composite. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 165 pp.nWang, Q., H. Sasaki, P. Yang, and S. Kawai. 1992. Utilization of laminated veneer lumber from Sabah plantation thinnings as beam flanges. III. Production of composite beam and its properties. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38(4):914-922.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.