Prediction of Fracture Toughness of Conifers

Authors

  • Robert W. Petterson
  • Jozsef Bodig

Keywords:

Fracture toughness, elastic parameters, tensile strength, specific gravity, moisture content, prediction equations

Abstract

Equations were developed to use in the prediction of the fracture toughness values of coniferous species based on the variation of specific gravity and moisture content. Equation parameters were determined for clear wood in opening mode fracture when the crack is located in a plane normal to the tangential direction and it propagates in the longitudinal direction, (KIcTL). The prediction equations developed are based on test results of ten coniferous species representing wide ranges of specific gravities and moisture conditions.

Analysis of the data revealed that the relationship between fracture toughness and specific gravity is similar for all species tested and a single equation may be used for all species. However, the effect of moisture content was significantly affected by extractive content, and separate relationships are required for low and high extractive content species below the fiber saturation point.

Tensile strengths and moduli of elasticity were determined both in the L and T directions. A highly significant relationship between ultimate tangential tensile stress and fracture toughness was found, indicating that flaws present in wood are likely the controlling mechanism of failure for this system.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials. 1981. Standard methods for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. ASTM Designation E 399-74.nAmerican Society for Testing and Materials. 1982. Standard methods for establishing structural grades and related allowable properties for visually graded lumber. ASTM Designation D 254-74.nBarrett, J. D. 1976. Effect of crack-front width on fracture toughness of Douglas-fir. Eng. Fract. Mech.8:711-717.nBodig, J., and J. R. Goodman. 1972. Prediction of elastic parameters of wood. Wood Sci.5(4):249-264.nCramer, S. M. 1981. A stress analysis model for structural wood members, M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering. Colorado State University.nDabholkar, A. Y., J. R. Goodman, and J. Bodig. 1980. Analysis of wood with knots and cross grain. Structural Research Report No. 31. Civil Engineering Dept., Colorado State University.nForintek Canada Corp. 1979. Proceedings, First International Conference on Wood Fracture: August 14-16. 1978, Banff. Alberta, Canada. 304 pp.nLeicester, R. H. 1974. Fracture strength of wood. First Australian Conference on Engineering Materials, University of New South Wales, Sidney, Australia.nMarkwardi, L. J., and T. R. C. Wilson. 1935. Strength and related properties of woods grown in the United States. USDA Tech. Bull. 479. 99 pp.nOsgood, C. C. 1971. A basic course in fracture mechanics: building on the fundamentals. Machine Design100(6):88-93.nPalka, L. C. 1973. Predicting the effect of specific gravity, moisture content, temperature and strain rate on the elastic properties of softwoods. Wood Sci. Technol.7(2):127-141.nPellicane, P. J. 1980. Ultimate tensile strength analysis of wood. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University.nPhillips, G. E., J. Bodig, and J. R. Goodman. 1981. Flow grain analogy. Wood Sci.14(2):55-64.nPorter, A. W. 1964. On the mechanics of the fracture in wood. For. Prod. J.14(8):325-331.nPugel, A. D. 1980. Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of coniferous knotwood. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Forest and Wood Sciences, Colorado State University.nSchniewind, A. P., and J. C. Centeno. 1973. Fracture toughness and duration of load factor I. Six principal systems of crack propagation and the duration factor for cracks propagating parallel to grain. Wood Fiber5(2):152-159.nSchniewind, A. P., and R. A. Pozniak. 1971. On the fracture toughness of Douglas-fir wood. Eng. Fract. Mech.2(3):223-233.nSchuldt, J. P. 1972. Unified testing procedure for determining the elastic parameters of wood. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Forest and Wood Sciences. Colorado State University.nTada, H. P., C. Paris, and G. R. Irwin, eds. 1973. Stress analysis of cracks handbook. Del Research Corp., Hellertown, PA.nU.S. Forest Products Laboratory. 1974. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 72. 528 pp.nWalsh, P. F. 1972. Linear fracture mechanics in orthotropic materials. Eng. Fract. Mech.4(3):533-541.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-27

Issue

Number 4 / October 1983

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.