Influence of Pit Aspiration on Earlywood Permeability of Douglas-Fir

Authors

  • R. W. Meyer

Abstract

Sapwood earlywood longitudinal gas permeability is a sensitive barometer of the effect of seasoning conditions on pit aspiration. The proportion of aspirated pit pairs was quantitatively linked with longitudinal gas permeability and can be used to explain the earlywood permeability of a given sample. If comparable levels of pit aspiration are found in two samples differing in permeability, however, it may be necessary to examine other anatomical aspects of the wood being permeated. Permeability is a function of the number of open pits per tracheid, which, coupled with tracheid length, determines the probability of occurrence of a continuous flow path through the wood specimen being permeated. Percentage pit aspiration operates in conjunction with number of pits per tracheid to determine the number of open pits per tracheid. While the proportion of aspirated pits can be measured and related to permeability, it is suggested that tracheid length, total number of pits per tracheid, and number of tracheids per square millimeter also be evaluated in order to assess properly the effect of pit aspiration on permeability.

References

Bramhall, G. and J. W. Wilson. 1971. Axial gas permeability of Douglas-fir microsections dried by various techniques. Wood Sci. In press.nComstock, G. L. 1970. Directional permeability of softwoods. Wood and Fiber, 1(4):283-289.nComstock, G. L., and W. A. Côté. 1968. Factors affecting permeability and pit aspiration in coniferous sapwood. Wood Sci. Technol., 2:279-291.nErickson, H. D., and R. J. Crawford. 1959. The effects of several seasoning methods on the permeability of wood to liquids. Proc. Am. Wood-Preservers Assoc., 55:210-219.nErickson, H. D., and R. N. Schmidt. 1969. Rupture of pit membranes during embedding procedures. Wood Sci. Technol., 3:194-202.nGriffin, G. J. 1919. Bordered pits in Douglasfir: A study of the position of the torus in mountain and lowland specimens in relation to creosote penetration. J. Forestry, 17:813-822.nGriffin, G. J. 1924. Further note on the position of the tori in bordered pits in relation to penetration of preservatives. J. Forestry, 22(6): 82-83.nHarris, J. M. 1954. Heartwood formation in Pinus radiata D. Don. New Phytologist, 53 (3):517-24.nKishima, T., and S. Hayashi. 1962. (On the closure of bordered pit pairs in coniferous tracheids.) Wood Res., 27:22-39.nKrahmer, R. L. 1961. Anatomical features of permeable and refractory Douglas-fir. Forest Prod. J., 11(9):439-441.nLiese, W. 1951. Über die Eindringung von öligen Schutzmitteln in Fichtenholz. Holz als Rohund Werkstoff, 9:374-378.nLiese, W., and J. Bauch. 1967a. On the closure of bordered pits in conifers. Wood Sci. Technol., 1(1):1-13.nLiese, W. 1967b. The effect of drying on the longitudinal permeability of sapwood of gymnosperms. (Souvenir for inauguration of laboratories, Indian Plywood Ind. Res. Ass.). Transl. Can. Dep. Forest. R.D., ODF TR318.nLuft, J. 1961. Improvements in epoxy embedding. J. Biochem. Biophys. Cyt., 9:409-414.nPhillips, E. W. J. 1933. Movement of the pit membrane in coniferous woods, with special reference to preservative treatment. Forestry, 7:109-120.nStamm, A. J., S. W. Clary, and W. J. Elliot. 1968. Effective radii of lumen and pit pores in softwood. Wood Sci., 1(2):93-101.nStone, C. D. 1939. A study on the bordered pits of Douglas-fir with reference to the permeability of wood to liquids. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Washington, Seattle.nThomas, R. J. 1969. The ultrastructure of southern pine bordered pit membranes as revealed by specialized drying techniques. Wood and Fiber, 1(2):110-123.nThomas, R. J., and D. D. Nicholas. 1966. Pit membrane structure in loblolly pine as influenced by solvent exchange drying. Forest Prod. J., 16(3):53-56.nWardrop, A. B. and G. W. Davies. 1961. Morphological factors relating to the penetration of liquids into wood. Holzforschung, 15(5): 129-141.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-19

Issue

Number 4 / Winter 1971

Section

Research Contributions

License

The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:

1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.

2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.

3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.