Examination of Lumber Price Trends for Major Hardwood Species

Authors

  • William G. Luppold
  • Matthew S. Bumgardner

Keywords:

Price variability, hardwood lumber, fashion trends

Abstract

Over the last 40 years, trends in interspecies and intergrade hardwood lumber prices have been erratic. In the early 1960s, high- and midgrade hard maple commanded high prices while red oak was the least valuable lumber regardless of grade. In the 1980s, high- and midgrade oak prices surged, but prices of all grades of maple and yellow-poplar declined. During the 1990s, maple prices increased in all grades while the price of oak increased only in the lower grades. It is important to understand changes in interspecies and intergrade pricing as well as the market forces causing these changes because lumber price reflects the use of these products relative to availability. In turn, relative utilization is used to evaluate and justify the relevance of emerging research problem areas. This paper examines changes in the interspecies prices for the major grades of hardwood lumber and relates these changes to species preferences, end markets, manufacturing processes, and sawtimber supply.

References

Bowe, S. A., and M. S. Bumgardner. 2004. Species selection in secondary wood products: Perspectives from different consumers. Wood Fiber Sci.36(3):319-328.nEmanuel, D., and C. Rhodes. 2002. Bulletin of hardwood market statistics: 1989-2000 Res. Note NE-375. USDA For. Ser., Northeast. Res. Stn. Newtown Square, PA. 22 pp.nEmanuel, D., and C. Rhodes. 2005. Bulletin of hardwood market statistics: First half 2004. Res. Note NE-384. USDA For. Ser., Northeast. Res. Stn. Newtown Square, PA. 22 pp.nFrye, L. R. 1996. The most popular furniture woods: The historical perspective. Wood and Wood Products Centennial 1896-1996. 100(14):304-307.nHardwood Market Report. 1966 to 2006. Hardwood Market Report, Memphis, TN.nHardwood Market Report. 2005a. 2004: The year at a glance. 8th annual statistical analysis of the North American hardwood market place. Memphis, TN.nHardwood Market Report. 2005b. Page 4, October 29, 2005 issue. Memphis, TN.nHardwood Review Global. 2005. George Barrett Editor. Charlotte, NC 5(10):28-29.nLuppold, W. G. 1983. The effect of changes in lumber and furniture prices on wood furniture manufacturers' lumber use. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap.NE-514. 8 pp.nLuppold, W. G. 1984. An econometric study of the U.S. hardwood lumber market. Forest Science30(4):1027-1037.nLuppold, W. G. and M. S. Bumgardner. 2006. Influence of markets and forest composition on lumber production in Pennsylvania. North. J. Applied For.23(2):87-93.nSmith, W. B., J. S. Vissage, D. R. Darr, and R. M. Sheffield. 2001. Forest resources of the United States, 1997. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-219. USDA For. Serv., North Cen. Res. Stn. St. Paul, MN. 190 pp.nUSDA Forest Service. 1965. Timber trends in the United States. USDA For. Serv. For. Res. Rep. Res. 17. 235 pp.nUSDA Forest Service. 1973. The outlook for timber in the United States. USDA For. Serv. For. Res. Rep. Res. 20. 367 pp.nUSDA Forest Service. 1982. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States 1952-2030. USDA For. Serv. For. Res. Rep. Res. 23. 499 pp.nUSDA Forest Service. 2005. Forest inventory mapmaker Version 1.0 USDA Forest Service. http://ncrs2.fs.fed.us/4801/fiadb/index.htm'>http://ncrs2.fs.fed.us/4801/fiadb/index.htmnUSDC Bureau of the Census. 1962. Lumber production and mill stocks 1961. M24T(61)-1. U.S. Dep. of Com., Bur. of the Census. Washington, DC. 7 pp.nUSDC Bureau of the Census. 1963. Lumber production and mill stocks 1962. M24T(62)-1. U.S. Dep. of Com., Bur. of the Census. Washington, DC. 7 pp.nUSDC Bureau of the Census. 1988. Lumber production and mill stocks 1987. M24T(87)-1. U.S. Dep. of Com., Bur. of the Census. Washington, DC. 9 pp.nUSDC Bureau of the Census. 2005. Lumber production and mill stocks 2004. MA321(04)-1. U.S. Dep. of Com., Bur. of the Census. Washington, DC. # 13pp.nWagner, J. E., and P. E. Sendak. 2005. The annual increase of Northeastern regional timber stumpage prices: For. Prod. J.55(2):36-45.n

Published

2007-09-27

Issue

Section

Research Contributions