Variation in the Anatomy and Specific Gravity of Wood within and Between Trees of Red Alder (<i>Alnus Rubra</i> Bong.)

Authors

  • Barbara L. Gartner
  • Hua Lei
  • Michael R. Milota

Keywords:

Fiber, vessel, ray, specific gravity, radial variation, wood quality

Abstract

Six 40-year-old red alders (Alnus rubra Bong.) were harvested from a mixed stand of A. rubra and big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum Pursh) in the Oregon Coast Range to evaluate variation in their wood characteristics at two heights. Because the trees had a slight lean (4 to 14®), we sampled along a diametric strip from the lower to upper side of the lean. For a disk from breast height and one from an upper height (5.8 to 6.1 m), we sampled 12-14 designated growth rings on both sides of the pith. For each sample we determined fiber length, vessel diameter, tissue proportion (proportion of a cross section occupied by fibers, vessels, rays, or axial parenchyma), and specific gravity. The variation of these properties between the two heights, between the lower and upper sides of the lean, and along the radius was analyzed among and within trees.

Variations between the two heights and between the lower and upper sides of the lean were minor or not significant for all measured characteristics. In the radial direction, fiber length and vessel diameter increased rapidly during the first 8 to 12 years (from 0.8 to 1.2 mm and 47 to 60 μm, respectively) and then leveled off. From pith to bark, these was no significant change in ray proportion, a small increase in the vessel proportion (from 23 to 28%), and a small decrease in the fiber proportion (from 63 to 57%). Specific gravity was constant radially and with height but varied significantly among trees (from 0.45 to 0.51 for tree means). These results suggest that the wood characteristics of A. rubra are quite uniform within individual trees with the exception of fiber length and vessel diameter, which increase radially in the first several growth rings.

References

Abdel-Gadir, A. Y., and R. L. Krahmer. 1993. Estimating age of demarcation of juvenile and mature wood in Douglas-fir. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(3):242-249.nAhrens, G. R. 1994. Hardwood resource management and future hardwood timber supplies in the Pacific Northwest. Page 5 in A Symposium on Western Hardwoods: Policy, Products and the Future, Oct. 12, 1994, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.nAtterburty, T. 1978. Alder characteristics as they affect utilization. Pages 71-81 in D. G. Briggs, D. S. DeBell, and W. A. Atkinson, cornpils. Utilization and management of alder. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-70. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR.nBendtsen, B. A. 1978. Properties of wood from improved and intensively managed trees. Forest Prod. J. 28(10):61-72.nBendtsen, B. A., and J. Senft. 1986. Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-growth eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(1):23-38.nBergman, S. I. 1949. Lengths of hardwood fibers and vessel segments. TAPPI 32:494-498.nButterfield, R. P., R. P. Crook, R. Adams, and R. Morris. 1993. Radial variation in wood specific gravity, fiber length and vessel area for two central American hardwoods: Hyeronima alchorneoides and Vochysia guatemalensis: Natural and plantation-grown trees. IAWA J. 14(2):153-161.nDeBell, D. S., and B. C. Wilson. 1978. Natural variation in red alder. Pages 193-208 in D. G. Briggs, D. S. DeBell, and W. A. Atkinson, compils. Utilization and management of alder. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-70. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR.nDinwoodie, J. M. 1961. Tracheid and fiber length in timber: A review of literature. Forestry 34:124-144.nEvans, J. W., II. 1996. Juvenile wood effect in red alder (Alnus rubra) and Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana). Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.nFukazawa, K. 1984. Juvenile wood of hardwoods judged by density variation. IAWA Bull. 5:65-73.nFukazawa, K., and J. Ohtani. 1982. Within-tree variation of wood element size in Tilia japanica.IAWA Bull. 3: 201-206.nHarringto, C. A., and D. S. DeBell. 1980. Variation in specific gravity of red alder (Alnus rubra) Can. J. For. Res. 10:293-299.nHernandez, R. E., and G. Restrepo. 1995. Natural variation in wood properties of Alnus acuminate H.B.K. grown in Colombia. Wood Fiber Sci. 27(1):41-48.nJackson, M., and R. A. Megraw. 1986. Impact of juvenile wood on pulp and paper products. Pages 75-81 in A technical workshop: Juvenile Wood: Wha Does It Mean to Forest Management and Forest Products? Forest Products Research Society, Madison, WI.nKrahmer, R. L. 1986. Fundamental anatomy of juvenile and mature wood. Pages 12-16 in A technical workshop: Juvenile Wood: What Does It Mean to Forest Management and Forest Products? Forest Products Research Society, Madison, WI.nLand, S. B., and J. C. Lee. 1981. Variation in sycamore wood specific gravity. Wood Sci. 13:166-170.nLei, H. 1995. The effects of growth rate and can bial age on wood properties of red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) and Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana Dougl.). Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Forest Products, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 192 pp.nLei, H., B. L. Gartner, and M. R. Milota. 1997. Effect of growth rate on the anatomy, specific gravity, and bending properties of wood from seven-year-old red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.). Can. J. For. Res. (in press).nLeney, L., A. Jackson, and H. D. Erickson. 1973. Properties of red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) and its comparison to other hardwoods. Pages 25-33 in D. G. Briggs, D. S. DeBell, and W. A. Atkinson, compils. Ut lization and management of alder. USDA Forest Servize General Technical Report PNW-70. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR.nLowell, E., and R. L. Krahmer. 1993. Effect of lean in red alder trees on wood shrinkage and density. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(1):2-7.nMaloney, T. M. 1986. Juvenile wood: Problems in composition board products. Pages 72-74 in A technical workshop: Juvenile Wood: What Does It Mean to Forest Management and Forest Products? Forest Products Research Society, Madison, WI.nMckimm, R. J., and Y. Ilic. 1987. Characteristics of the wood of young fast-grown trees of Eucalyptus nitens Maiden with special reference to provenance variation. III. Anatomical and physical characteristics. Aust. For. Res. 17:19-28.nNeter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner. 1989. Applied linear regression models, 2nd ed., Richard D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL. 667 pp.nNoskowiak, A. F. 1978. Distribution of aggregate rays in red alder. Wood Fiber 10(1):58-68.nOkkonen, E. A., H. E. Wahlgren, and R. R. Maeglin. 1972. Relationships of specific gravity to tree height in commercially important species. Forest Prod. J. 22(7): 37-41.nPanshin, A. J., and C. H. de Zeeuw. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 772 pp.nParker, M. L., J. H. Smith, and S. Johnson. 1978. Annual-ring width and density patterns in red alder. Wood Fiber 10(2):120-130.nPeszlen, I. 1994. Influence of age on selected anatomical properties of Populus clones. IAWA J. 15:311-321.nQuanci, M. J. 1988. Mechanical, physical, and anatomical properties of short-rotation Douglas-fir and white ash. M.S. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.nRaettig, T. 1994. The western hardwood resource, industry and policy. Page 4 in A Symposium on Western Hardwoods: Policy, Products and the Future, Oct. 12, 1994, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.nRasband, W. 1992. NIH Image 1.47: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.nSAS Institute. 1988. SAS/Stat User's Guide. Release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.nSteel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 663 pp.nTaylor, F. W. 1973. Variation in the anatomical properties of South Africa grown Eucalyptus grandis. Appita 27:171-178.nThomas, R. J. 1984. The characteristics of juvenile wood. Pages 40-52 in Proc. Symposium on Utilization of the Changing Wood Resource in Southern United States. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.nValentine, F. A. 1962. Natural variation in specific grivity in Populus tremuloides in northern New York. Pages 17-24 in 9th Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Syracuse, NY.nWilson, B. F., and B. L. Gartner. 1996. Lean in red alder: Growth stress, tension wood and righting response. Can. J. For. Res. 1951-1956.nZobel, B. J., and J. P. van Buijtenen. 1989. Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 363 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-19

Issue

Section

Research Contributions