Modeling the Effect of Out-of-Plane Fiber Orientation in Lumber Specimens
Keywords:Fiber orientation, lumber tensile strength, fracture, finite elements
AbstractA method is presented to account for the effect of three-dimensional fiber orientations near knots in a two-dimensional lumber tensile strength prediction model. Data we have collected show that grain angles dive from 15 to 90 degrees out of the wide face plane of flat-grained lumber within a region of about one knot radius from the visual edge of a knot. The diving nature of the grain angles is accounted for in a two-dimensional model, called GASPP+, by transforming a three-dimensional material compliance matrix, and extracting the appropriate coefficients for use in a two-dimensional compliance matrix. Failure criteria are modified to reflect the decreased strength associated with nonzero dive angles. These modifications led to accurate tensile behavior predictions, as evidenced by load-displacement plots and ultimate load measurements of lumber specimens. It is shown that consideration of dive angles is important in predicting the tensile strength and failure mode of thin lumber specimens. Lumber specimen thickness and the manner of loading influence the magnitude of the dive effect on strength.
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1983. Standard methods for establishing structural grades and allowable properties for structural lumber. ASTM Designation: D245-81.nAnthony, R., and J. Bodig. 1988. Tension behavior of knot-containing Douglas-fir boards. Proceedings of the 1988 International Conference on Timber Engineering, vol. 2. Forest Products Research Society. Pp. 779-786.nBadreddine, L. 1988. Supporting studies and tests for modeling lumber in tension. M.S. Independent Study Report, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.nBechtel, F. K., and J. R. Allen. 1987. Methods of implementing grain angle measurements in the machine stress rating process. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. Washington State University. Pp. 303-353.nBodig, J., and J. R. Goodman. 1973. Prediction of elastic parameters for wood. Wood Science 5(4): 249-264.nBodig, J., and B. A. Jayne. 1982. Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc., New York.nCook, R. D. 1981. Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.nCramer, S. M., and W. Fohrell. 1989. Method for simulating the tension performance of lumber members. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Mechanics of Cellulosic and Polymeric Materials, The Third Joint ASCE/ASME Mechanics Conference. Pp. 193-200.nCramer, S. M., and J. R. Goodman. 1986. Failure modeling: A basis for the strength prediction of lumber. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(3):446-459.nCramer, S. M., and K. McDonald. 1989. Predicting lumber tensile stiffness and strength with local grain angle measurements and failure analysis. Wood Fiber Sci. 21(4):393-410.nCramer, S. M., D. C. Stahl, W. B. Fohrell, and K. A. McDonald. 1988. Exploring the relationship between local grain angle and initial fracture in lumber subject to tensile load. Proceedings of the 1988 International Conference on Timber Engineering, vol. 2. Forest Products Research Society. Pp. 566-575.nDabholkar, A. 1980. Analysis of wood with knots and cross grain. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering. Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nFreese, C. E., and D. M. Tracey. 1976. The natural isoparametric triangle versus collapsed quadrilateral for elastic crack analysis. Int. J. Fracture 12:767-770.nGreen, A. E. 1945. Stress systems in aeolotropic plates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. PRSLA 184A.nJuedes, B. M. 1986. Failure modeling of wood tensile members. M.S. Independent Study Report. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Wisconsin-Madison.nMatthews, P. C., and J. F. Soest. 1986. Method for determining localized fiber angle in a three-dimensional fibrous material. U.S. Patent 4,606,345.nMcDonald, K. A., and B. A. Bendtsen. 1986. Measuring localized slope of grain by electrical capacitance. Forest Prod. J. 23(5):75-78.nMcLauchlan, T. A., J. A. Norton, and D. J. Kusec. 1973. Slope-of-grain indicator. Forest Prod. J. 23(5):50-55.nPetterson, R. W., and J. Bodig. 1983. Prediction of the fracture toughness of conifers. Wood Fiber Sci. 15(4):302-316.nPhillips, G. E., J. Bodig, and J. R. Goodman. 1981. Flow-grain analogy. Wood Fiber Sci. 14(2): 55-64.nPugel, A. 1980. Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of coniferous knotwood. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Forest and Wood Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nPugel, A. 1986. Fracture mechanics-based failure criterion for wood. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Forest and Wood Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nSchmidt, M. K. 1987. Modeling considerations for predicting the tensile behavior of lumber. M.S. Independent Study Report. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Wisconsin-Madison.nStahl, D. C. 1988. The effect of "dive" on the tensile behavior of defect containing lumber: Modifications to the U. W. Grain Angle Strength Prediction Program. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.nSugimori, M., and T. Sadoh. 1988. Measuring three-dimensional grain angles surrounding knots by image processing. J. Japan Wood Research Society 34(8):647-651.nTang, R. C. 1984. Stress concentration around knots in laminated beams. Wood Fiber Sci. 16(1): 57-71.nWu, E. M. 1967. Application of fracture mechanics to orthotropic plates. J. Appl. Mech. 12:967-974.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.