Variation of Microfibril Angle Within Individual Tracheids

Authors

  • Susan E. Anagnost
  • Richard E. Mark
  • Robert B. Hanna

Keywords:

Cellulose, tracheids, microfibril angle, soft-rot cavities

Abstract

Utilizing the orientation of soft-rot cavities, microfibril angles were measured in individual tracheids (pulped fibers) and thin sections of southern pine in order to determine the extent of variation. Within individual tracheids of southern pine, microfibril angles were consistent along the length of a tracheid and when measured between bordered pits. Microfibril angles were highly variable on the radial walls containing bordered pits. Microfibril angles approached 90° around bordered pits, but the angles on the walls opposite the bordered pits were consistent with the average angle along the length of the tracheid. Variation (standard deviation) was less in latewood tracheids than in earlywood tracheids. Within individual tracheids, there was no correlation between microfibril angle and tracheid width. Across an annual ring of southern pine, microfibril angle gradually decreased through the earlywood and became much smaller in the latewood.

References

Anagnost, S. E., R. E. Mark, and R. B. Hanna. 1999. Utilization of soft rot cavity formation as a tool for understanding the relation between microfibril angle and mechanical properties of cellulosic tracheids. Proc. American Society of Mechanical Engineers 1999 Summer Conference Symposium on the Mechanical Properties of Cellulosic Materials, June 27-30, Blacksburg, VA.nAnagnost, S. E., R. E. Mark, and R. B. Hanna. 2000. Utilization of softrot cavity orientation for the determination of microfibril angle. Part 1. Wood Fiber Sci. 32(1):81-87.nDonaldson, L. A. 1998. Between-tracheid variability of microfibril angles in radiata pine. Pages 206-224 in B. G. Butterfield, ed. Microfibril angle in wood. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.nHuang, C.-L., N. P. Kutscha, G. J. Leaf, and R. A. Megraw. 1998. Comparison of microfibril angle measurement techniques. Pages 177-205 in B. G. Butterfield, ed. Microfibril angle in wood. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.nKhalili, S. 1999. Microscopic studies on plant fiber structure. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Silvestria 98, Uppsala, Sweden. 33 pp.nMark, R. E. 2001. Mechanical properties of fibers. Chapter 14 in R. E. Mark, C. C. Habeger, J. Borch, and M. B. Lyne, eds. Handbook of physical testing of paper, Vol. 1, 2d ed revised and expanded. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.nNavi, P. 1998. The influence of microfibril angle on wood cell and wood mechanical properties, experimental and numerical study. Pages 62-80 in B. G. Butterfield, ed. Microfibril angle in wood. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.nPanshin, A. J., and C. de Zeeuw. 1980. Textbook of wood technology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. 722 pp.nSaranpaa, P., R. Serimaa, S. Andersson, E. Pesonen, T. Suni, and T. Paakkari. 1998. Variation of microfibril angle in Norway spruce and Scots pine—comparing X-ray diffraction and optical methods. Pages 225-239 in B. G. Butterfield, ed. Microfibril angle in wood. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions