Appearance Wood Products and Psychological Well-Being


  • Jennifer Rice
  • Robert A. Kozak
  • Michael J. Meitner
  • David H. Cohen


Appearance wood products, psychological health, well-being


The study of how people's psychological health and well-being can be connected to wood used in appearance applications is a new and relatively unexplored area of inquiry, despite strong theoretical support, intuitive reasoning, and a growing recognition of the importance of healthful living. This research attempted to better understand this phenomenon by mapping out people's perceptions of wood used in interior applications. Specifically, the aim of this exploratory study was to determine what types of environments appearance wood products can create and to gauge whether or not the use of these types of products could have positive impacts on people's emotional states. To that end, a total of 119 respondents from the Greater Vancouver Regional Area were asked to partake in a three-part experimental study, consisting of a q-sort exercise, personal interviews, and a self-administered survey. The findings suggest that people's response to wood is, for the most part, extremely positive, with subjects generally showing a strong preference for rooms containing many wood details. There also appears to be a strong belief that the use of wood can help to create healthful environments, and commonly evoked descriptors for wood rooms include "warm," "comfortable," "relaxing," "natural," and "inviting." The reasons underlying these findings are complex and further exploration rooted in the field of environmental psychology is warranted. However, the results of this study could have potentially far-reaching implications for manufacturers of appearance wood products seeking to differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive marketplace. Specifically, these findings point to an opportunity to market wood in an entirely new and innovative manner with the inclusion of potential psychological benefits into the total product concept.


Baker, P., E. Elliott, and J. Banta. 1998. Prescriptions for a healthy house. A practical guide for architects, builders, and homeowners. Inword Press, Santa Fe, NM.nB. C. Stats. 2001. Census Profile: British Columbia. Online. Available:'>, H. R., C. Rai, and L. K. Ozanne. 2005. Determining consumer preferences for furniture timber. J. Forest Prod. Bus. Res.2(2)16.nBroman, N. O. 2000. Means to Measure the Aesthetic Properties of Wood. Ph.D. thesis., University of Luleo, Skellefta, Sweden. 25 pp.nBuilding Science Basics. 2001. Healthy house Rx. Online. Available:'>http://www.HealthHouse.orgnCanada Mortgage and Housing Council. 2001. Canadian Housing Technology. Online. Available:'>, H. N. 1968. Health and Housing. Canadian Welfare Council, Ottawa, Canada.nDillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY. 464 pp.nFarrow, T. 2003. Personal communication. March 18, 2003.nFell, D. 2002. Consumer Visual Evaluation of Canadian Wood Species. Forintek Canada Corp. Vancouver, Canada. 111 pp.nFrumkin, H. 2001. Beyond toxicity: The greening of environmental health. Am. J. Prevent. Med.20:47-53.nGifford, R. 1987. Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Toronto, Canada. 472 pp.nGodish, T. 2001. Indoor environmental quality. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. 461 pp.nHoadley, B. 1990. Identifying wood: Accurate results with simple tools. The Taunton Press, Newtown, CT. 223 pp.nJarmusch, A. 2003. Mind-set: Research Project will study Architecture's Impact on the Brain. Online. Available:'>, S., R. Kaplan, and J. S. Wendt. 1972. Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material. Perceptions and Psychophysics12:354-356.nKrieger, J., and D. L. Higgins. 2002. Public Health Matters—Housing and Health: Time again for Public Health Action. Am. J. Public Health.92(5):758-768.nLohr, V. I., C. H. Pearson-Mims, and G. K. Goodwin. 1996. Interior plants may improve worker productivity and reduce stress in a windowless environment. J. Environ. Hort.14(2):97-100.nMcKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1988. Q Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. Newbury Park, CA. 83 pp.nMasuda, M. 1992. Visual characteristics of wood and the psychological images. Bull. Kyoto Univ. Forests38(12): 1075-1081.nMasuda, M., and N. Yamamoto. 1988. The wood ratio in interior space and the psychological images. Bull. Kyoto Univ. Forests60:285-298.nPenney, T. E. 2003. Architecture: The Healing Art. AlArchitect. Online. Available:'>, C. Y. et al. 2001. Canadian Experience in Healthy Housing. International Symposium on Current Status of Indoor Air Pollution by Organic Compounds and Countermeasures for Healthy Housing, Tokyo, Japan, 1/12/2001), P. 31-35, January 18, 2001. Online. Available:'>, B. M. 1983. Indoor Air Pollution and Housing Technology. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Policy Development and Research Sector. Ottawa, Canada.nSolomon, M., E. Stuart, A. Carson, and B. Smith. 2001. Marketing: Real people, real decisions. Pearson Education Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada. 587 pp.nSpetic, W., R. A. Kozak, and D. H. Cohen. 2005. Willingness to pay and preferences for healthy home attributes in Canada. Forest Prod. J.55(10):19-24.nTaylor, R. E. 2002. Wood Markets. The Solid Wood Products Outlook. 2002 to 2006. International Wood Markets Research Inc. Vancouver, Canada.nUlrich, R. S. 1984. The psychological benefits of plants. Garden.8(6):16-21.nUlrich, R. S. 1986. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape Urban Plann.13:29-44.nUlrich, R. S., U. Dimberg, and B. L. Driver. 1990. Psychophysiological indicators of leisure consequences: Stress reducing effects of leisure in natural settings. J.Leisure Res.22:154-166.nUlrich, R. S., R. F. Simons, B. D. Losito, E. Fiorito, M. A. Miles, and M. Zelson. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psych.11:201-230.nWade, C., and C. Tavris. 2000. Psychology 6th ed. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ. 654 pp.n






Research Contributions