Observations On Microfibril Organization of Douglas-Fir Bordered Pit-Pair Membranes By Scanning Electron Microscopy

Authors

  • J. L. Tschernitz
  • I. B. Sachs

Keywords:

<i>Pseudosuga menziesii</i> var. <i>glauca</i>, wood structure, enzymatic degradation

Abstract

Bordered pit-pair membranes of green sapwood Douglas-fir after alteration by pectinase enzymes followed by critical point drying were examined with the scanning electron microscope to confirm and expand results of earlier reported observations with other microscopic equipment. Micrographs of treated bordered pit-pair membranes with various degrees of pectin removal clearly showed the spatial relationship of torus structure. The technique used permits easy cleavage of the torus that, in turn, reveals in great detail the inner organization of microfibrils in the torus sandwich. Indications are that the initial pectinase dissolution of the torus is initiated in regions of plasmodesmata. Elasticity of the microfibrils in water or ethanol is vividly displayed.

References

Hauch, J., and H. Berndt. 1973. Variability of the chemical composition of pit membranes in bordered pits of gymnosperms. Wood Sci. Technol. 7:6-19.nHauch, J., W. Liese, and F. Berndt. 1970. Biological investigations for the improvement of the permeability of softwoods. Holzforschung 24(6):199-205.nHauch, J., W. Liese, and F. Scholz. 1968. Über die Entwicklung und stoffliche Zusammensert-zung der Hoftüpfelmembranen von Läng-straeheiden in Conifern. Holzforschung 22 (5):144-153.nHauch, J., W. Liese, and R. Schultze. 1972. The morphological variability of the bordered pit membranes in gymnosperms. Wood Sci. Technol. 6:165-184.nEsau, K. 1965. Plant anatomy. 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., N. Y. P. 44.nFrey-Wyssling, A., H. H. Bosshard, and K. Muhlethaler. 1956. The submicroscopic formation of bordered pits. Planta 47:115-126.nJutte, S. M., and J. F. Levy. 1971. The structure and degradation of bordered pits in gymnosperm tracheids as revealed by the scanning reflection electron microscope. Acta Bot. Neerl. 20(5):453-466.nMeyer, R. W. 1974. Effect of enzyme treatment on bordered-pit ultrastructure, permeability, and toughness of the sapwood of three western conifers. Wood Sci. 6(3):220-230.nNicholas, D. D., and R. J. Thomas. 1967. Influence of steaming on the ultrastructure of bordered pit membrane in loblolly pine. For. Prod. J. 18(1):57-59.nNicholas, D. D., and R. J. Thomas. 1968. The influence of enzymes on structure and permeability of loblolly pine. Proc. AWPA 64:70-76.nSachs, I. B. 1963. Torus of the bordered pit membrane in conifers. Nature 198:906,907.nSachs, I. B., and R. E. Kinney. 1972. An "ultra-filter" in the margo of mature bordered pits? Proc. Electron Microsc. Soc. Am. 13:206,207.nTschehnitz, J. L. 1973. Enzyme mixture improves creosote treatment of kiln-dried Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir. For. Prod. J. 23(3):30-38.nWeatherwax, R. C., and D. F. Caulfield. 1971. Cellulose aerogels: An improved method for preparing a highly expanded form of dry cellulose. Tappi 54(6):985,986.nWood, R. K. S. 1960. Pectic and cellulolytic enzymes in plant disease. Ann. Rev. Plant Phys. 2:299-322.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions