Linear Expansion And Thickness Swell Of Mdf As A Function Of Panel Density And Sorption State

Authors

  • Stefan Ganev
  • Alain Cloutier
  • Robert Beauregard
  • Guy Gendron

Keywords:

MDF (medium density fiberboard), linear expansion, linear expansion coefficient, thickness swell, thickness swell coefficient, hysteresis

Abstract

Experiments were conducted using ASTM standard methods to determine the medium density fiberboard (MDF) expansion properties and swelling characteristics as a function of panel density and sorption state. Specimens without density profile were produced by removing the surface layers of laboratory MDF panels. The results from the trials showed that for laboratory MDF, linear expansion is homogenous in panel plane. When specimen density increased, linear expansion, linear expansion coefficient, thickness shrinkage coefficient, linear contraction, and linear contraction coefficient increased. Thickness swell was higher than thickness shrinkage at any density level. Thickness swell coefficient was higher than thickness shrinkage coefficient for low density levels. The values of linear contraction and linear contraction coefficient (in desorption) were higher than the values of linear expansion and linear expansion coefficient (in adsorption). The values on thickness swell and thickness shrinkage were much higher than the values of linear expansion and linear expansion and linear contraction at any density level. The effect of density on linear expansion, linear expansion coefficient and linear contraction coefficient was significantly stronger than the effect of density on thickness swell, thickness swell coefficient and thickness shrinkage.

References

American Society for Testing And Materials (ASTM D 1037). 1999. Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood base fiber and particle panel materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.10.nChow, P., 1976. Properties of medium-density, dry formed fiberboard from seven hardwood residues and bark. Forest. Prod. J. 26(5):23-32.nCloutier, A., G. Gendron, P. Blanchet, S. Ganev, R. Beauregard. 2001. Finite element modeling of dimensional stability in layered wood composites. 35th International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium, Washington State University, April 3-5. Pullman, WA.nFujimoto, Y., S. Morizono, T. Inamasu, and Y. Mataki. 1995. Mechanism of generating linear expansion with adsorption and desorption for particleboards: behavior of interactive restraint between layers. Bull. Kyushu University Forests. No. 73, 43-60 (with English figures and tables).nGanev, S. B., A. Cloutier, R. Beauregard, and G. Gendron. 2003. Effect of moisture content and density on moisture movement in MDF panels. Wood Fiber Sci. 35(1):68-82.nGeimer, R. L. 1982. Dimensional stability of flakeboards as affected by board specific gravity and flake alignment. Forest Prod. J. 32(8):44-52.nGreubel, D., and M. Paulitsch. 1977. Untersuchungen über die Dimensionänderungen von Spanplatten in Plattenebene. 3. Mitteilung: Einfluss von Rohstoffzusammensetzung und verfahrentechnishen Variablen auf die Dimensionsänderung henolharzgebundener Spanplatten. Holz Roh-Werkst. 35:413-420.nHiziroglu, S., and O. Suchsland. 1993. Linear expansion and surface stability of particleboard. Forest Prod. J. 43(4):31-34.nNiemz, P., and H. Poblete. 1996. Untersuchungen zur Dimensionsstabilität von mitteldichten Fasrplatten (MDF) und Spanplatten. Holz Roh-Werkst. 54:141-144.nSiau, J.F. 1995. Wood: Influence of moisture on physical properties. Dept. of Wood Science and Forest Products, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. 227 pp.nSteiger, J. H. 1980. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull. 87(2):245-251.nSuchsland, O. 1974. Determination of small linear expansion coefficients from curvature of two-ply laminate strips. Forest Prod. J. 24 (4):38-39.nSuchsland, O., D. E. Lyon, and P. E. Short. 1978. Selected properties of commercial medium-density fiberboards. Forest Prod. J. 28(9):45-49.nSuchsland, O., D. E. Lyon, and H. Xu. 1989. On the measurement of linear expansion of particleboard and medium density fiberboard Forest Prod. J. 39(6):39-42.nSuzuki, S., and K. Miyamoto. 1998. Effect of manufacturing parameters on the linear expansion and density profile of particleboard. J. of Wood Sci. 44 (6):444-450.nVital, B.R., Wilson, J. B., and P. H. Kanarek. 1980. Parameters affecting dimensional stability of flakeboard and particleboard. Forest Prod. J. 30(12):23-29.nWatkinson, P. J. and N. L. Gosliga. 1989. Effect of moisture content on mechanical and dimensional properties of New Zealand and particle boards and fiberboards. Pages 171-176 in G. B. Walford, ed. Proc. Second Pacific Timber Engineering Conf. 28-31 Aug. University of Aukland, NZ Centre for Continuing Education.nWoodson, G. E. 1975. Effects of bark, density profile, and resin content on medium-density fiberboards from southern hardwoods. Forest Prod. J. 26 (2): 39-43.nXu, H., and O. Suchsland. 1991. The expansion potential: a new evaluator of the expansion behavior of wood composites. Forest Prod. J., 41 (6): 39-42.nXu, H., and O. Suchsland. 1997. Linear expansion of wood composites: a model. Wood Fiber Sci. 1997, 29(3):272-281.nXu, W., and P. M. Winistorfer. 1995 Layer thickness swell and layer internal bond of medium density fiberboard and oriented strandboard. Forest Prod. J. 45(10): 67-71.nXu, W., and W. W. Moshler. 1996. A procedure to determine water absorption distribution in wood composite panels. Wood and Fiber Science. 28(3):286-294.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions