Characteristics of Paper Mill Sludge and Its Utilization for the Manufacture of Medium Density Fiberboard
Keywords:De-inking sludge, fiberboard, fiber properties, paper mill sludge, primary sludge, secondary sludge, spruce-pine-fir
AbstractDe-inking paper sludge (DPS) and primary sludge (PS) containing 20% secondary sludge from a paper mill were characterized as to their suitability for the manufacture of medium density fiberboard. Compared with DPS, PS had a lower ash content, higher holocellulose content, more and longer fibers, lower pH, and higher buffering capacity. These characteristics make PS a better fiber resource for fiberboard than DPS. Fiberboards were manufactured at the Pilot Plant of Forintek (Québec City, QC, Canada) using virgin spruce-pine-fir fiber (SPF) and PS or DPS at different sludge/SPF weight ratios with 12% ureaformaldehyde resin. At an equal sludge/SPF weight ratio, PS-SPF panels had much higher mechanical properties than did DPS-SPF panels. At a PS/SPF weight ratio of 7:3, the mechanical properties of PS-SPF panels were higher than the requirements of ANSI A208.2-2002 MDF standard for Grade 120 in terms of internal bond strength, modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity, and thickness swelling. With DPS/SPF weight ratios as low as 3:7, the tested mechanical properties of DPS-SPF panels could meet the requirements of ANSI A208.2-2002 MDF standard for Grade 120.
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2002. Median Density Fiberboard (MDT) for Interior Applications. ANSI A208.2-2002. Composite Panel Association, Gaithersburg, MD.nASTM Standard D1037-99. 1999. Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials.nBeauchamp, C. J., M.-H. Charest, and A. Gosselin. 2002. Examination of environmental quality of raw and composting de-inking paper sludge. Chemosphere46:887-895.nDavis, E., S. M. Shaler, and B. Goodell. 2003. The incorporation of paper deinking sludge into fiberboard. Forest Prod. J.53(11/12):46-54.nEroğlu, V., and A. M. SaatçI. 1993. Reuse of sludge from pulp and paper industry pilot and full scale applications. Water Sci. Technol.28(2):17-26.nGrigoriou, A. H. 2003. Waste paper-wood composites bonded with isocyanate. Wood Sci. Technol.37:79-89.nJohns, W. E., and K. A. Niazi. 1980. Effect of pH buffering capacity of wood on the gelation time of ureaformaldehyde resin. Wood Fiber12:255-263.nLavrent'ev, S. P., S. N. Dmitriev, Y. I. Chernousov, V. A. Kolmogortsev, and V. S. Startsev. 1978. Study of the possibility of using activated sludge in the production of fiberboards. Pages 64-68 in V. F. Filatenkov, ed. Vodopol'zovanie Ochistka Proizvod. Stochnykh Vod. Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Tsellyul.-Bum. Prom-sti. Leningrad, USSR.nNadelman, A. H., and L. P. Newton. 1960. A practical approach to utilization of solids from deinking mill effluent. Tappi J.43:120-128.nÖztürk, I., V. Eroğlu, and A. Bastürk. 1992. Sludge utilization and reduction experiences in the pulp and paper industry. Water Sci. Technol.26:2105-2108.nReid, I. 1997. Solid residues generation and management by Canadian pulp and paper mills in 1995. Miscellaneous report MR 352. Ed. Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada, Pointe-Claire, Canada.nScott, C. T., J. Simonsen, D. Klingenberg, and S. Zauscher. 2000. Beneficial use of pulp and paper industry residuals: extrusion for the manufacture of building panels. Tech. Bull. NO.814. Ed. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, USA.nTakats, P., and M. H. Simatupang. 1993. Suitability of fiber sludge as reinforcing material for manufacturing of gypsum fiberboards. Inorganic-bonded Wood Fiber Comp. Mater.3:97-103.nTappi Test Methods. 1993. T211 0m-93, Ash in wood and pulp.nTappi Test Methods. 1998. T222 om-98, Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp.nTappi Useful Methods. 1976. 249, Delignification of unbleached pulp (chlorine gas method).n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.