Effects of Resin and Wax on the Water Uptake Behavior of Wood Strands


  • Yang Zhang
  • Juwan Jin
  • Siqun Wang


Wicking test, water uptake behavior, phenol-formaldehyde resin, wax, strand


Dimensional stability is an important property of wood composites. Both resin and wax are essential additives in the manufacture of composite panels such as OSB. Resin binds wood elements together while wax acts as a water repellent. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of phenolformaldehyde resin and emulsion wax on the water uptake behaviors of commercial southern yellow pine strands using a wicking test. During the test, the water uptake amounts of strands blended with different resin and wax levels were recorded continuously. The effects of different factors on water uptake behaviors of strands were analyzed with ANOVA. The results indicated that resin level, wax content, grain direction, and strand density had significant effects on water uptake behaviors of strands. Lower resin level and wax content led to a rapider water uptake rate during the early stage of the wicking test and a larger total amount of water absorbed at the end of test. Water uptake behavior along parallel-to-grain direction differed from that perpendicular-to-grain direction, and strands with higher density tended to have relatively lower total water uptake amount.


Espert, A., and F. S. Vilaplana. 2004. Comparison of water absorption in natural cellulosic fibres from wood and one-year crops in polypropylene composites and its influence on their mechanical properties. Composites: Part A35:1267-1276.nGardner, D. J., S. K. Waage, and T. J. Elder. 1990. Bonding flakeboard with filled and extended phenolformaldehyde resin. Forest Prod. J.40(7/8):31-36.nGu, H., S. Wang, T. Neimsuwan, and S. G. Wang. 2005. Comparison study of commercial OSB flooring products in thickness swell and mechanical performance. Forest Prod. J.55(12):239-245.nHawke, R. N., B. C. H. Sun, and M. R. Gale. 1993. Effect of fiber mat moisture content on physical properties of polysocyanate-bonded hardboard. Forest Prod. J.43(1):15-20.nKelly, M. W. 1977. Critical literature review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. USDA Forest Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-10. Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI, 65 pp.nLu, C., and F. Lam. 2001. Relationship between thickness swelling and mat structures in robot-formed flakeboard mats. Holz Roh- Werkst.59:201-210.nMaldas, D. C., and D. P. Kamdem. 1999. Wettability of extracted southern pine. Forest Prod. J.49(11/12):91-93.nMaloney, H. M. 1993. Modern particleboard and dryprocess fiberboard manufacturing. Miller Freeman Inc. San Francisco, CA.nRowell, M. R., A. M. Tillman, and L. Zhengtian. 1986. Dimensional stabilization of flakeboard by chemical modification. Wood Sci. Technol.20:83-95.nSon, J., and D. J. Gardner. 2004. Dimensional stability measurements of thin wood veneers using Wilhelmy plate technique. Wood Fiber Sci.36(1):98-106.nWang, S., and P. M. Winistorfer. 2000. The effect of species and species distribution on the layer characteristics of OSB. Forest Prod. J.50(4):37-44.nWang, S., and P. M. Winistorfer. 2001. Flake compression behavior in a resinless mat as related to dimensional stability. Wood Sci. Technol.35:379-393.nYoungquist, J. A. 1986. Dimensional stability of acetylated aspen flakeboard. Wood Fiber Sci.18(1):90-98.n






Research Contributions