Maximum Effective Pit Pore Radii Of The Heartwood And Sapwood Of Six Softwoods As Affected By Drying And Resoaking

Authors

  • Alfred J. Stamm

Abstract

Air pressures were determined that will just displace water or water containing a wetting agent from the void structure of cross sections of green sapwood and heartwood of six different softwoods varying in thickness from 1/32 inch to 3 inches. Measurements were again made on the same specimens after air- and oven-drying and resaturating with water or water containing a wetting-agent solution. Maximum effective radii of the openings were calculated from these pressures and the surface tensions of the liquids. Maximum lumen radii and maximum fiber lengths were obtained from the linear plots of the pore radii against the thickness of the specimens in the thin-specimen range. Both were greater for sapwood than for heartwood. Maximum effective pit pore radii were obtained for passage through 50 pits in series from the linear plots of the logarithm of the effective pit pore radius against the logarithm of the number of pits traversed in series. These values were used to show relative differences in calculated permeabilities between sapwood and heartwood, which varied greatly between species, and to show the effect of drying with and without a wetting agent present. Wetting agents tend to prevent loss in permeability on drying, presumably by reducing the drying tension on the pit membranes, thus avoiding aspiration, at least in the pit membranes containing the larger pores.

References

Comstock, G. L. 1965. Longitudinal permeability of green eastern hemlock. Forest Prod. J., 15(10): 441-449.nComstock, G. L. 1967. Longitudinal permeability of wood to gases and nonswelling liquids. Forest Prod. J., 17(10): 41-46.nComstock, G. L. 1968. Relationship between the permeability of green and dry eastern hemlock. Forest Prod. J., 18(18): 20-23.nGriffin, G. L. 1919. Bordered pits in Douglas-fir: a study of the position of the torus in mountain and lowland specimens in relation to creosote penetration. J. Forestry, 17: 813-822.nHart, C. A., And R. J. Thomas. 1967. Mechanism of bordered pit aspiration as caused by capillarity. Forest Prod. J., 17(11): 61-68.nLiese, W., and J. Bauch. 1967. On the closure of bordered pits in conifers. Wood Sci. and Tech., 1(1): 1-13.nResch, H., and D. G. Arganbright. 1968. Variation of specific gravity, extractive content, and tracheid length in redwood trees. Forest Science, 14(2): 148-155.nStamm, A. J. 1963. Permeability of wood to fluids. Forest Prod. J., 13(10): 503-507.nStamm, A. J. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. Ronald Press Co., N.Y. 405 p.nStamm, A. J. 1966. Maximum pore diameter of film materials. Forest Prod. J., 16(12): 59-63.nStamm, A. J. 1967. Flow of fluids in wood, Part I. Wood Sci. and Tech., 1(2): 122-141.nStamm, A. J., and D. G. Arganbright. 1970. Surface tension of the sap of several species of wood. Wood and Fiber (In press).nStamm, A. J., S. W. Clary, and W. J. Elliott. 1968. Effective radii of lumen and pit pores in softwoods. Wood Science, 1(2): 94-101.nThomas, R. J., and D. D. Nicholas. 1966. Pit membrane structure in loblolly pine as influenced by solvent exchange drying. Forest Prod. J., 16(3): 53-56.nZuidemn, H. H., and G. W. Waters. 1941. Correction factor for surface and interfacial tension by ring method. Ind. Eng. Chem., Anal. Ed., 13: 312.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-22

Issue

Section

Research Contributions