Effect of Tie-Layer on the Bond Strength Between Thermoplastic and Borate-Treated Wood Substrate

Authors

  • Steven G. Michael
  • Vikram Yadama
  • Donald A. Bender

Keywords:

Thermoplastic, tie-layer, wood composite, peel strength, preservative treatment, Parallam, Douglas-fir, southern pine

Abstract

A challenge in using wood or wood composites for exterior applications is durability. Borate-treated wood substrates are durable if leaching of the chemical over time can be reduced to acceptable levels. The goal of this project was to encapsulate borate-treated structural wood and wood-based composites with thermoplastic to extend their durability. In this study, the efficacy of two tie-layers (maleic anhydride modified high-density polyethylene and styrene-butadiene polymer) in bonding high-density polyethylene (HDPE) to treated wood substrate was examined together with determining the ideal hot-press parameters necessary to achieve a good bond. Boric oxide treated Douglas-fir and southern pine Parallam® and untreated Douglas-fir solid wood were the substrates investigated. The optimum processing parameters were 180°C platen temperature, 1035 kPa press pressure, and 300 s press time. Bond strength was determined by conducting a 90° peel test and a block-shear test. Durability of the thermoplastic barrier layer was evaluated by subjecting specimens to an accelerated aging test and reevaluating the bond strength. Maleic anhydride-modified HDPE tie-layer yielded improved bond strength that was durable, especially when bonded to a treated southern pine substrate.

References

ASTM (2006) D1101-97a. Standard test method for integrity of adhesive joints in structural laminated wood products for exterior use. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2007a) D905-08e1. Standard test method for strength properties of adhesive bonds in shear by compression loading. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2007b) D6862-04. Standard test method for 90 degree peel resistance of adhesives. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nBreyfogle FW III (1992) Statistical methods for testing, development, and manufacturing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY. 516 pp.nDai H, Smith MJ, Ramani K (2004) Design and processing of a thermoplastic composite reinforced wood structure. Polym Composite 25(2):119-133.nDavalos JF, Qiao PZ, Trimble BS (2000) Fiber-reinforced composite and wood bonded interface, part 1. Durability and shear strength. J Compos Tech Res 22(4):224-231.nFPL (1999) Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-113. USDA For Serv Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. 463 pp.nGacitua W (2008) Influence of wood species on properties of wood/HDPE composites. PhD thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. 120 pp.nGacitua W, Wolcott MP (2009) Morphology of wood species affecting wood-thermoplastic interaction: Microstructure and mechanical adhesion. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol 11(3):217-231.nGardner DJ, Davalos JF, Munipalle UM (1994) Adhesive bonding of pultruded fiber-reinforced plastic to wood. Forest Prod J 44(5):62-66.nIslam MN, Ando K, Yamauchi H, Kobayashi Y, Hattori N (2008) Comparative study between full cell and passive impregnation method of wood preservation for laser incised Douglas-fir lumber. Wood Sci Technol 42(4):343-350.nKolosik PC, Myers GE, Koutsky JA (1993) Bonding mechanisms between polypropylene and wood: Coupling agent and crystallinity effects. Pages 15-19 in MP Wolcott, ed. Wood fiber/polymer composites: Fundamental concepts, process, and material options. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI.nKumar G, Ramani K (2000) Characterization of wood-polypropylene composite sandwich system. J Composite Mater 34(18):1582-1599.nLevi M (1973) Control methods. Pages 183-216 in DD Nicholas, ed. Wood deterioration and its prevention by preservative treatments, Volume I: Degradation and protection of wood. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.nLiu FP, Rials TG, Simonsen J (1998) Relationship of wood surface energy to surface composition. Langmuir 14 (2):536-541.nMahlberg R, Paajanen L, Nurmi A, Kivisto A, Koskela K, Rowell RM (2001) Effect of chemical modification of wood on the mechanical and adhesion properties of wood fiber/polypropylene fiber and polypropylene/veneer composites. Holz Roh Werkst 59(5):319-326.nMeyer RW (1971) Influence of pit aspiration on earlywood permeability of Douglas-Fir. Wood Fiber Sci 4(2):328-339.nMichael SG (2008) Thermoplastic encapsulation of wood strand composite using a tie-layer. MS thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA. 56 pp.nMorrell JJ, Stark NM, Pendleton DE, McDonald AG (2006) Durability of wood-plastic composites. Wood Design Focus 16(3):7-10.nMorris PI, Cooper P (1998) Recycled plastic/wood composite lumber attached by fungi. Forest Prod J 48(1):86-88.nStat-Ease (2005) Handbook for experimenters. Stat-Ease, Inc. Minneapolis, MN. 43 pp.nStat-Ease (2006) Design-Expert® for Windows—Software for design of experiments (DOE). Minneapolis, MN. http://www.statease.com'>http://www.statease.comnSummitt R, Sliker A (1980) Wood. Volume IV. CRC handbook of materials science. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL. 459 pp.nTascioglu C, Goodell B, Lopez-Anido R (2003) Bond durability characterization of preservative treated wood and E-glass/phenolic composite interfaces. Compos Sci Technol 63(7):979-991.n

Downloads

Published

2010-10-11

Issue

Section

Research Contributions