Impact of Spacings on Sapwood and Heartwood Thickness in <i>Picea Mariana</i> (Mill.) B.S.P. and <i>Picea Glauca</i> (Moench.) Voss
Keywords:Spacing, sapwood thickness, heartwood thickness, Picea mariana, Picea glauca
AbstractThe impact of spacing on sapwood and heartwood thickness was studied in a 38-year-old plantation in northern Ontario. Ten trees each of Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. and Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss grown at spacings 1.8 m x 1.8 m, 2.7 m x 2.7 m, and 3.6 m x 3.6 m were randomly selected for the study. Tree diameter, sapwood and heartwood thickness, both as a ring count and as a length measure, and sapwood and heartwood basal area were measured. For both species, it was found that the effect of the 1.8-m x 1.8-m spacing usually was significantly different from that of the other two levels. Only for sapwood basal area in Picea mariana were all three levels of spacing declared statistically significant from each other. Sapwood basal area increased with increased spacing for this species. For Picea glauca, the maximum sapwood basal area occurred at the second level of spacing. Sapwood basal area occupied approximately half of the total tree basal area at age 38. The number of sapwood rings in Picea glauca showed no significant differences over the levels of spacing. It is concluded that spacing plays an important role and has various degrees of impact on tree diameter and heartwood and sapwood thickness.
Carrodue, B. B. 1972. Variability in the proportion of heartwood formed in woody stems. New Phytol. 71:713-718.nChalk, L. 1951. Water and growth of Douglas-fir. Q. J. For. 45(4):237-242.nClark, A., III, and J. R. Saucier. 1989. Influence of initial planting density, geographic location, and species on juvenile wood formation in southern pine. Forest Prod. J. 39(7/8):42-48.nEspinosa-Bancalari, M. A., D. A. Perry, and J. D. Marshall. 1987. Leaf area-sapwood area relationships in adjacent young Douglas-fir stands with different early growth rates. Am. J. For. Res. 17:174-180.nGrier, C. C., and R. H. Waring. 1974. Conifer foliage mass related to sapwood area. For. Sci. 20:205-206.nHarris, J. M., and S. Kripas. 1959. Notes on the physical properties of ponderosa pine, monticola pine, western red cedar, and Lawson cypress grown in New Zealand. N. Z. For. Serv., For. Res. Inst. Res. Note 16, 24 pp.nHazenberg, G., and K. C. Yang. 1991a. Sapwood/heartwood width relationships with tree age in balsam fir. I.A.W.A. Bulletin 12(1):95-99.nHazenberg, G., and K. C. Yang. 1991b. The relationship of tree age with sapwood and heartwood width in black spruce, Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. Holzforschung (in press).nHillis, W. E. 1987. Heartwood and tree exudates. Springer-Verlag, New York. 268 pp.nHillis, W. E., and N. Ditchburne. 1974. The prediction of heartwood diameter in radiata pine trees. Can. J. For. Res. 4:524-529.nIhara, N. 1972. A dendrometrical study on heartwood formation of forest trees. Bull. Kyushu Univ. For. 461(March):123-129.nKaufmann, M. R., and C. A. Troendle. 1981. The relationship of leaf area and foliage biomass to sapwood conducting area in four subalpine forest tree species. For. Sci. 27(3):477-482.nLassen, L. W., and E. A. Okkonen. 1969. Sapwood thickness of Douglas-fir and five other western softwoods. Res. Pap. Pvt. FPL No. 124, U.S. For. Prod. Lab.nLong, J. N., and F. W. Smith. 1987. Leaf area-sapwood area relations of lodgepole pine as influenced by stand density and site index. Can. J. For. Res. 18:247-250.nLong, J. N., F. W. Smith, and D. R. Scott. 1981. The role of Douglas-fir stem sapwood and heartwood in the mechanical and physiological support of crowns and development of stem form. Can. J. For. Res. 11:459-464.nMarchand, P. J. 1984. Sapwood area as an estimation of foliage biomass and projected leaf area for Abies balsamea and Picea rubens.Can. J. For. Res. 14:85-87.nPaul, B. H. 1932. The relation of certain forest conditions to the quality and value of second-growth loblolly pine lumber. J. For. 30:4-21.nPaul, B. H. 1952. Variability in wood of southern pines as influenced by silvicultural practice. U.S. For. Ser. Rep. FPL-R 1923:10 pp.nPaul, B. H. 1959. The effect of environmental factors on wood quality. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL, U.S. For. Prod. Lab., Madison.nPothier, D., H. S. Margolis, J. Poliquin, and R. H. Waring. 1989. Relation between the permeability and the anatomy of jack pine sapwood with stand development. Can. J. For. Res. 19:1564-1570.nPuritch, G. S. 1977. Distribution and phenolic composition of sapwood and heartwood in Abies grandis and effects of the balsam woolly aphid. Can. J. For. Res. 7:54-62.nPurkayastha, S. K., S. P. Agrawal, R. D. Tandon, and L. Chauham. 1980. Variation in the proportion of heartwood in Eucalyptus tereticornis.Indian For. 106:466-473.nRyan, M. G. 1989. Sapwood volume for three subalpine conifers: Predictive equations and ecological implications. Can. J. For. Res. 19:1397-1401.nShortle, W. C., and J. Bauch. 1986. Wood characteristics of Abies balsamea in the New England States compared to Abies alba from sites in Europe with decline problems. I.A.W.A. Bull. n.s. 7(4):375-387.nSmith, J. H. G., J. Walters, and R. W. Wellwood. 1966. Variation in sapwood thickness of Douglas fir in relation to tree and section characteristics. For. Sci. 12(1): 97-103.nTischler, K. 1976. Improvement of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew Univ., Jerusalem, Israel. 129 pp.nTrendelenburg, R., and H. Mayer-Wegelin. 1955. Das Holz als Rohstoff. Hanser, München. 541 pp.nWaring, R. H., H. L. Gholz, C. C. Grier, and M. L. Plummer. 1977. Evaluating stem conducting tissue as an estimation of leaf area in four woody angiosperm. Can. J. Bot. 55:1474-1477.nWaring, R. H., P. E. Schroeder, and R. Oren. 1982. Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can. J. For. Res. 12:556-560.nWellwood, R. W. 1955. Sapwood-heartwood relationships in second growth Douglas fir. Forest Prod. J. 5(2):108-111.nWhitehead, D., W. R. N. Edwards, and P. G. Jarvis. 1984. Conducting sapwood area, foliage area, and permeability in mature trees of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta.Can. J. For. Res. 14:940-947.nYang, K. C. 1987. Growth ring contrast enhancement and the differentiation of sapwood and heartwood zones. Wood Fiber Sci. 19(4):339-342.nYang, K. C., and C. Hazenberg. 1991a. Sapwood and heartwood width relationships to tree age in Pinus banksiana Lamb.Can. J. For. Res. 21:521-525.nYang, K. C., and C. Hazenberg. 1991b. Relationship between tree age and sapwood/heartwood width in Populus tremuloides Michx. Wood Fiber Sci. 23(2):247-252.nYang, K. C., C. Hazenberg, G. E. Bradfield, and J. R. Maze. 1985. Vertical variation of sapwood thickness in Pinus banksiana Lamb. and Larix laricina (DuRoi) K. Koch. Can. J. For. Res. 15:822-828.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.