Exploring Customer Value in the Hardwood Lumber Industry
Keywords:Customer value, hardwood lumber, marketing research, logistic regression
AbstractIn this paper, the author investigates the role of product, service, and price-relative to competition-in determining customer value perceptions among buyers of northern hardwood lumber. Based on survey data collected in December 1999, this study examines the importance of attributes affecting purchase decisions and compares these findings with a regression approach incorporating an explicit customer value measurement. These data indicate that attributes deemed important to the purchaser are not necessarily the same attributes related to perceptions of highly valued suppliers. Results indicate that consistent availability of desired species and aesthetic qualities of shipments are the most influential attributes in the identification of suppliers providing high levels of customer value. Finally, value perceptions are examined across broad industrial buyer segments.
Anderson, J. C., and J. A. Narus. 1999. Business market management: Understanding, creating, and delivering value. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 430 pp.nBand, W. A. 1991. Creating value for customers. John Wiley, New York, NY, 352 pp.nBest, R. J. 1999. Market-based management: Strategies for growing customer value and profitability, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 385 pp.nBolton, R. N., and J. H. Drew. 1991. A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. J. Consumer Res.17 (March):375-384.nBush, R. J., S. A. Sinclair, and P. A. Arman. 1990. Match your hardwood lumber to current market needs. Southern Lumberman July:24-25.nDay, George S. 1994. Capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Marketing58(October):37-52.nDay, George S. 1999. Market driven strategy: Processes for creating value. Free Press, New York, NY. 432 pp.nEastin, I. L., S. R. Shook, and D. D Simon. 1999. Softwood lumber substitution in the U.S. residential construction industry in 1994. Forest Prod. J.49(5):21-27.nForbes, C. L., S. A. Sinclair, R. J. Bush, and P. A. Araman. 1994. Influence of product and supplier attributes on hardwood lumber purchase decisions in the furniture industry. Forest Prod. J.44(2):51-57.nGale, B. T. 1994. Managing customer value. The Free Press, New York, NY. 424 pp.nGross, I. 1997. Evolution in customer value. In Customer value: Moving forward—back to basics. ISBM Report 13-1997:5-6.nIdassi, J. O., T. M. Young, P. M. Winistorfer, D. M. Ostermeier, and R. B. Woodruff. 1994. A customer-oriented marketing method for hardwood lumber companies. Forest Prod. J.44(7-8):67-73.nJones, T. O., and W. Eari, Sasser. 1995. Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Review 73(November-December):88-89.nLilien, G. L. 1987. Business marketing: Present and future. Industrial Market. Purchasing2(3):3-22.nNagle, T. T., and R. K. Holden. 1995. The strategy and tactics of pricing: A guide to profitable decision making, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 400 pp.nNaumann, E. 1995. Creating customer value. Thompson Executive Press, Cincinnati, OH. 280 pp.nPorter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, New York, NY. 557 pp.nReddy, V. S., and R. J. Bush. 1998. Measuring softwood lumber value: A conjoint analysis approach. Forest Science44(1):145-157.nRoadcap, C., P. M. Smith, and R. P. Vlosky. 2000. EDI and barcoding in the homecenter industry. Forest Prod. J.50(9):32-38.nRust, R. T., P. J. Danaher, and S. Varki. 1999. Comparative service quality and competitive marketing decisions. Working paper: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/csm/index.html'>www.vanderbilt.edu/csm/index.htmlnSinha, I., and W. S. DeSarbo. 1998. An integrated approach toward the spatial modeling of perceived customer value. J. Marketing Res.35(May):236-249.nSinha, I., W. S. DeSarbo, and S. Young-Helou. 1999. Sources and consequences of customer value and customer loyalty: Empirical evidence from the field. Working paper, pp. 27.nSlywotzky, A. J. 1996. Value migration. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. 326 pp.nSmith, T. M., and P. M. Smith. 1999. Distributor and end-user trade show attendance objectives: An opportunity for adaptive selling. Forest Prod. J.49(1):23-29.nTreacy, M., and F. Wiersema. 1995. The discipline of market leaders. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. 204 pp.nTripp-Umbach and Associates, Inc. 1999. The US hardwood marketing study. A Project of the Conger Foundation for Hardwood Marketing and the Hardwood Manufacturers Association, January, 45 pp.nWoodruff, R. B. 1997. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. J. Academy Marketing Sci.25(2):139-153.nZeithaml, V. A. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-ends model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing52(July):2-22.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.