Basic Density of Norway Spruce. Part II. Predicted By Stem Taper, Mean Growth Ring Width, and Factors Related To Crown Development
Keywords:Crown development, <i>Picea abies</i>, stem taper, growth ring width, basic density, wood density
AbstractIn a fertilization trial near Stråsan, central Sweden, six net parcels of Norway spruce (Picea abies) planted in 1957 and clear-felled in 1989 were used to evaluate basic density in relation to growth rate. Growth rate had been regulated by annual dressings of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. The six parcels represented two unfertilized, two medium, and two heavily fertilized treatments. Various thinning procedures were applied to each stand in 1982 and 1988. Based on the author's published paper of cambial activity regulation, this study focused on variables related to crown development and basic density. Three sets of predictors were used: stem taper, mean ring width, and factors related to crown development. Stem taper was found to be a significant predictor of basic density, with r2 varying from 0.34 to 0.60, depending on the form of the model. Mean ring width was found to be a significant predictor of basic density, with r2 = 0.61. Mean ring width was found dependent on factors related to crown development. Tree height, diameter outside bark, tree height x diameter outside bark, site quality, stand density, and thinning procedure were found to be significant predictors of growth ring width, with r2 = 0.95. Factors related to crown development were used in a multivariate regression model in which tree height, tree height x diameter on bark, and thinning procedure were found to be significant predictors of basic density, with r2 = 0.68 at tree level. At stand level, volume production, stand density, and thinning procedure were found to be significant predictors of basic density, with r2 = 0.99.
ANON. 1994. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.09, 4th ed. vol. 1, 2.nAronsson, A, and C-O Tamm. 1991. Continuous measurement of stand and tree parameters at Strasan fertilization experiment. (Unpublished). Dept. of Ecology and Environmental Research, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.nBaker, F. S. 1950. Principles of silviculture. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, Toronto, London.nBurger, H. 1939. Baumkrone und Zuwachs in zwei hiebsreifen Fichtenbeständen. Mitt. Schweiz. Anstalt forstl. Versuchsw. 21:147-176.nBurger, H. 1953. Holz, Blattmenge und Zuwachs. XIII. Fichten im gleichalterigen Hochwald. Mitt, Schweiz. Anstalt forstl. Versuchsw. 29:38-103.nEricson, B. 1966. Gallringens inverkan på vedens torr-råvolymvikt, höstvedhalt och kärnvedhalt hos tall och gran. Dept. of For. Yield Research. Res. Note No. 10.nEriksson, H. 1976. Production of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in Sweden. Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. For. Yield Res., Res. Note No. 51.nHakkila, P. 1979. Wood density survey and dry weight tables for pine, spruce, and birch stems in Finland. Communicationes Instituti Forestalls Fenniae 96.3:1-59.nHildebrandt, G. 1954. Untersuchungen an Fichtenbestanden über Zuwachs und Ertrag reiner Holzsubstanz. Deut. Verlag Wissenschaften, Berlin, Germany.nJohansson, K. 1993. Influence of initial spacing and tree class on the basic density of Picea abies. Scand. J. Forest Res. 8:18-27.nKärkkäinen, M. 1984. Effect of tree social status on basic density of Norway spruce. Silva Fennica. 18(2): 115-120.nKlem, G. G. 1934. Undersökelser av granvirkets kvalitet. Medd. Norske Skogsforsøksv. 5(2): 197-348.nKlem, G. G., F. Loschbrandt, and O. Bade. 1945. Undersökelser av granvirke i forbindelse med slipe- og sulfit kokeforsök. Medd. Norske Skogsforsøksv. 31:1-127.nKucera, B. 1992. Skandinaviske normer for testing av sma felfrie prover av heltre. Skogforsk, Norwegian Forest Research Institute, Dept. of Forestry, Agricultural University of Norway.nKucera, B. 1994. A hypothesis relating current annual height increment to juvenile wood formation in Norway spruce. Wood Fiber Sci. 26(1):152-167.nKyrkjeeide, P. A. 1990. A wood quality study of suppressed, intermediate, and dominant trees of plantation grown Picea abies. USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nLindström, H. 1996. Basic density in Norway spruce: Pan I. A literature review. Wood Fiber Sci. 28(1): 15-27.nMadsen, T. L., P. Moltesen, and P. O. Oleson. 1978. The influence of thinning degree on basic density, production of dry matter, branch thickness and number of branches of Norway spruce. Del Forstl. Forsøgsv. Danm. 36:181-204.nMadsen, T. L., P. Moltesen, and P. O. Oleson. 1985. Effect of fertilization on the basic density and production of dry matter in Norway spruce. Det Forstl. Forsøgsv. Danm. 40(2): 141-172.nMead, D. J., and C. O. Tamm. 1988. Growth and stem form changes in Picea abies as affected by stand nutrition. Scand. J. Forest Res. 3:505-513.nMoltesen, P., T. L. Madsen, and P. O. Oleson. 1985. The influence of spacing on the production of dry matter and wood quality of Norway spruce. Det Forstl. Forsøgsv. Danm. 40:53-76.nNylinder, P. 1953. Volymviktsvariationer hos gran. Medd. Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, 43(3): 1-4.nPechmann, H. V., and O. Schaite. 1955. Die auswir-kung der waldbaulichen Behandlung auf die holzeigen-schaften der Fichte. Fw. Cbl. 74:305-318.nPersson, A. 1975. Wood and pulp of Norway spruce and Scots pine at various spacings. Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Notes 37.nSchniewind, A. P. 1962. Horizontal specific gravity variation in tree stems in relation to their support function. Forest Science. 8(2): 111-118.nSchultze-Dewitz, G. 1960. Wie wirkt der Einfluss der Stellung eines Baumes im Bestand auf seine Holzstruktur aus?. Holzforsch. u. Holzverwert. 12:30-33.nTamm, C. O., A. Aronsson, and H. Burgtorf. 1974. The optimum nutrition experiment Stråsan. A brief description of an experiment in a young stand of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) Res. Note. 17, Royal Coll. For. Dept. of Forest Ecology. Stockholm, Sweden.nTrendelenburg, R., and H. Mayer-Wegelin. 1955. Das Holz als Rohstoff. Carl Hanser, Munich, Germany.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.