Simulation of the Mat Formation Process


  • Balazs G. Zombori
  • Frederick A. Kamke
  • Layne T. Watson


Wood-based composites, oriented strandboard, mat formation, random flake mat, Monte-Carlo simulation, void volume, bonded area


The parameters of the hot-pressing process have a substantial effect on the final mechanical and physical properties of wood-based composites. The number of interacting variables during the consolidation is prohibitively large to assess a wide variety of data by experimental means. A combined stochastic and deterministic model, based on fundamental engineering principles, was developed and validated for establishing the critical relationships between the processing parameters and the physical properties of oriented strandboard (OSB). In the first phase of this research, a Monte-Carlo simulation model was developed for describing the spatial structure of a three-layer OSB. The model was designed to mimic the strand deposition during the mat formation, including the three-dimensional spatial geometry, orientation, and density of the strands. These physical characteristics of the mat formation process were considered as stochastic variables that can be described by well-developed probability distributions. The parameters of these underlying distributions were derived from data collected on industrial strands by using an image analysis technique. The model superimposes a grid on the simulated mat and is capable of computing the number of strands, as well as the thickness and density of the mat, at each grid point. Additionally, it can predict the change in several void volume fractions and strand contact area within the mat during the consolidation. The model has application to wafer, particle, and fiber mats as well. This structural simulation model is the basis of further model development that describes the heat and mass transfer processes, and the viscoelastic nature of the hot-pressing operation during OSB manufacturing.


Bhagwat, S. 1971. Physical and mechanical variations in cottonwood and hickory flakeboards made from flakes of three sizes. Forest Prod. J.21(9):101-103.nBrumbaugh, J. 1960. Effect of flake dimension on properties of particleboard. Forest Prod. J.10(5):243-246.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1993. Compression behavior of randomly formed wood flake mats. Wood Fiber Sci.25(4):349-358.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1994a. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part II. Modeling and simulation of a randomly-formed flake layer network. Wood Sci. Technol.28(2):135-146.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1994b. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part III. Modeling the formation of multi-layered random flake mats. Wood Sci. Technol.28(3):229-239.nHeebink, B. G., and R. A. Hann. 1959. How wax and particle shape affect the stability and strength of oak particleboards. Forest Prod. J.9(7):197-203.nHoglund, H., U. Sholin, and G. Tistad. 1976. Physical properties of wood in relation to chip refining. Tappi59(6):144-147.nKallmes, O. J. 1961. The application of probability theory to papermaking. Tappi44(7):516-519.nKallmes, O. J., and H. Corte. 1960. The structure of paper. Part I. The statistical geometry of an ideal two dimensional fiber network. Tappi43(9):737-752.nKallmes, O. J., H. Corte., and G. Bernier. 1961. The structure of paper. Part II. The statistical geometry of a multiplanar fiber network. Tappi44(7):519-528.nKelley, M. W. 1977. Critical literature review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. General Tech. Rep. FPL-10 USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab.nLang, M. E., and M. P. Wolcott. 1995. Modeling the consolidation of wood-strand mat. AMD-Vol. 209/MD-Vol. 60, Mechanics of cellulosic materials. ASME 1995.nLang, M. E., and M. P. Wolcott. 1996a. A model for viscoelastic consolidation of wood-strand mats. Part I. Structural characterization of the mat via Monte Carlo simulation. Wood Fiber Sci.28(1):100-109.nLang, M. E., and M. P. Wolcott. 1996b. A model for viscoelastic consolidation of wood-strand mats. Part II. Static stress-strain behavior of the mat. Wood Fiber Sci.28(3):369-379.nLaw, A. M., and W. D. Kelton. 1982. Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, NY. 400 pp.nO'Rourke, J. 1994. Computational geometry in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. 346 pp.nSteiner, P. R., and C. Dai. 1993. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part I. Rationale for model development. Wood Sci. Technol.28(1):45-51.nStrickler, M. D. 1959. Effects of press cycle and moisture content on properties of Douglas-fir flakeboard. Forest Prod. J.9(7):203-215.nSuchsland, O. 1959. An analysis of the particle board process. Michigan Quart. Bull.42(2):350-372.nSuchsland, O. 1962. The density distribution in flake boards. Michigan Quart. Bull.45(1):104-121.nSuchsland, O. 1967. Behavior of particleboard mat during the press cycle. Forest Prod. J.17(2):51-57.nSuchsland, O., and H. Xu. 1989. A simulation of the horizontal density distribution in a flakeboard. Forest Prod. J.39(5):29-33.nSuchsland, O., and X. Hong. 1989. Model analysis of flakeboard variables. Forest Prod. J.41(11/12):55-60.n






Research Contributions