Predicting Lumber Tensile Stiffness and Strength With Local Grain Angle Measurements and Failure Analysis
Keywords:
Lumber tensile strength, fracture, finite elementAbstract
A mechanistic model is presented for predicting the tensile stiffness and strength of 2 by 4 lumber boards containing a single major face knot. The primary inputs to the model are local grain angle maps for each wide face of a board and estimates of average clear-wood properties. The grain angle maps were obtained through electrical scanning of board surfaces and represented the in-plane orientation of the wood fibers. Out-of-plane dive angles were not considered. The model simulates the failure process that occurs within lumber subject to tension and thereby provides insight to, and understanding of, the failure of wood with defects. The model is devoid of empirical adjustment factors, and it has produced tensile strength predictions that correlate with measured strengths by a correlation coefficient of 0.86 and an average absolute error of 12%. It is hoped that insight gained through use of this model will provide a foundation for improvements in lumber grading.References
ASCE. 1984. Structural wood research—State-of-the-art and research needs. R. Y. Itani and K. F. Faherty, eds. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.nASTM. 1987a. Standard methods of static tests of timbers in structural sizes. American Society of Testing and Materials, Method D 198-84.nASTM. 1987b. Standard methods of testing small clear specimens of timber. American Society of Testing and Materials, Method D 143-83.nAnderson, E. A., and A. Koehler. 1955. Instruments for rapidly measuring slope of grain in lumber. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab. Rep. 1592.nAnthony, R. W. 1986. Experimental data for the tension behavior of Douglas-fir with defects. M.S. thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nBadreddine, L. 1988. Supporting studies and tests for modeling lumber in tension. M.S. independent study report, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison.nBechtel, F. K., and J. R. Allen. 1987. Methods of implementing grain angle measurements in the machine stress rating process. Sixth Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. Washington State University, Pullman. September. Pp. 303-353.nBoatright, S. W. J., and G. G. Garrett. 1979. The effect of knots on the fracture strength of wood II. A comparative study of the methods of assessment, and comments on the application of fracture mechanics to structural timber. Holzforschung 33:73-77.nBodig, J., and J. R. Goodman. 1973. Prediction of elastic parameters for wood. Wood Sci. 5(4): 249-264.nCook, R. D. 1981. Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.nCramer, S. M. 1981. A stress analysis model for wood structural members. M.S. thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nCramer, S. M, and J. R. Goodman. 1986. Failure modeling: A basis for strength prediction of lumber. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(3):446-459.nDabholkar, A. 1980. Finite element analysis of wood with knots and cross grain. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nFreese, C. E., and D. M. Tracey. 1976. The natural isoparametric triangle versus collapsed quadrilateral for elastic crack analysis. Int. J. Fracture 12:767-770.nGreen, A. E. 1945. Stress systems in aelotropic plates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, PRSLA, Vol. 184A.nJuedes, B. J. 1986. Failure modeling of wood tensile members. M.S. independent study report, University of Wisconsin, Madison.nKoehler, A. 1955. Guide to determining slope of grain in lumber and veneer. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab. Rep. 1585.nMall, S., J. E. Murphy, and J. E. Shottafer. 1983. Criterion for mixed mode fracture in wood. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 109(3):680-690.nMcDonald, K. A., and B. A. Bendtsen. 1986. Measuring localized slope of grain by electrical capacitance. Forest Prod. J. 23(5):75-78.nMcDonald, K. A., and B. A. Bendtsen. 1987. Research progress in modeling tensile strength of lumber from localized slope of grain. Sixth Symposium on the Destructive Testing of Wood. Washington State University, Pullman.nMcLauchlan, T. A., and D. J. Kusec. 1978. Continuous non-contact slope-of-grain detection. Fourth Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Washington State University, Pullman. Pp. 67-76.nMcLauchlan, T. A., and D. J. Kusec. 1973. Slope-of-grain indicator. Forest Prod. J. 23(5): 50-55.nPearson, R. G., 1974. Application of fracture mechanics to the study of tensile strength of structural lumber. Holzforschung 28(1): 11-19.nPellicane, P. J. 1980. Ultimate tensile strength analysis of wood. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nPetterson, R. W., and J. Bodig. 1983. Prediction of fracture toughness of conifers. Wood Fiber Sci. 15(4):302-316.nPhillips, G. E., J. Bodig, and J. R. Goodman. 1981. Flow-grain analogy. Wood Sci. 14(2):55-64.nPugel, A. D. 1980. Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of coniferous knotwood. M.S. thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nPugel, A. D. 1986. Fracture mechanics-based failure criterion for wood. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins.nSchmidt, M. K. 1987. Modeling considerations for predicting the tensile behavior of lumber. M.S. independent study report, University of Wisconsin, Madison.nSoest, J. F. 1987. Applications of optical measurement of slope of grain. Sixth Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Washington State University, Pullman.nTang, R. C. 1984. Stress concentration around knots in laminated beams. Wood Fiber Sci. 16(1): 55-71.nTriboulet, P., P. Jodin, and G. Pluvinage. 1984. Validity of fracture mechanics concepts applied to wood by finite element calculation. Wood Sci. Technol. 18:51-58.nWu, E. M. 1967. Application of fracture mechanics to orthotropic plates. J. Appl. Mech. 12:967-974.nZandbergs, J. G., and F. W. Smith. 1988. Finite element fracture predictions for wood with knots and cross grain. Wood Fiber Sci. 20(1):97-106.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
