Characteristics of Sugar Maple Wood Surfaces Produced by Helical Planing
Keywords:Helical, planing, surface, roughness, wetting, sugar maple
AbstractIn real helical planing, the knives form a continuous oblique cutting edge with an angle to the cutterhead rotation axis. Tool manufacturers affirm that the helical cutterheads produce superior quality surfaces. However, literature on the effect of this cutting geometry on the surface quality of planed wood is scarce. The surface quality of helical-planed sugar maple was evaluated as a function of two planing modes, four feed speeds, and three cutting depths. The helical planing across the grain produced surfaces with higher roughness and improved wetting properties. A slight torn grain was observed in some samples that were helical-planed obliquely to the grain. As feed speed increased, surfaces became rougher and wetting was accelerated. Increasing cutting depth reduced surface roughness, mainly when planing across the grain. Cross-grain helical planing appears to have a good potential to reduce dependence on sanding to improve surface adhesion properties and enhance performance of coatings.
Berolzheimer, C. P. 1991. Recherches en usinage du bois. II. La lutte contre le bruit. In Conference prepared for the Department of Wood Sciences, Faculty of Forestry and Geomatics, University of Laval, Quebec City. 22 pp.nCantin, M. 1967. Propriétés d'usinage de 16 essences de bois de l'Est du Canada. Direction générale des Forêts, n° 1111 S. 31 pp.nDavis, E. M. 1962. Machining and related characteristics of United States hardwoods. Tech. Bull. 1267. USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.nde Moura, L. F., and R. E. Hernández. 2005. Evaluation of varnish coating performance for two surfacing methods on sugar maple wood. Wood Fiber Sci.37(2):355-366.nDolenko, A. J., R. L. Desai, and M. R. Clarke. 1974. Application parameters for water-based coatings on wood products. J. Inst. Wood Sci.6(5):18-22.nGray, V. R. 1964. Contact angles, surface tensions and adhesion. Page 42 in Proc. Conferences of the Northampton College of Advanced Technology, EC1, England.nInternational Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1984. Rugosité de surface-Terminologie-Partie 1: Surface et ses paramètres. ISO 4287-1. Geneva, It.nJones, C. W. 1994. Cutterheads and knives for machining wood. C. W. Jones, Seattle, WA, 138 pp.nKoch, P. 1964. Wood machining processes. Ronald Press, New York, NY. 530 pp.nKoch, P. 1976. Prototype flaking head smooths surfaces left by headrig or edger chipping heads. Forest Prod. J.26(12):22-27.nLiptáková, E., and J. Kúdela. 1994. Analysis of the woodwetting process. Holzforschung48(2):139-144.nShi, S. Q., and D. J. Gardner. 2001. Dynamic adhesive wettability of wood. Wood Fiber Sci.33(1):58-68.nStewart, H. A. 1971a. Chip formation when orthogonally cutting wood against the grain. Wood Sci.3(4):193-203.nStewart, H. A. 1971b. Chips produced with a helical cutter. Forest Prod. J.21(5):44-45.nStewart, H. A. 1975a. Knife planing across the grain can be applied to hardwoods. USDA, Forest Service, Research Note, North Central Forest Experiment Station, n° NC-196. 4 pp.nStewart, H. A., and W. F. Lehmann. 1974. Cross-grain cutting with segmented helical cutters produces good surfaces and flakes. Forest Prod. J.24(9):104-106.nStewart, J. S. 1975b. Noise-reducing tooling for planer noise control. Page 174 in Modern Sawmill Techniques, v. 4, Proc. 4th Sawmill Clinic, San Francisco, CA.nStewart, J. S., and F. D. Hart. 1976. Control of industrial wood planer noise through improved cutterhead design. Noise Control Eng.7(1):4-9.nWålinder, M. 2000. Wetting phenomena on wood. Factors influencing measurements of wood wettability. In KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Manufacturing Systems, Wood Technology and Processing, Stockholm, Sweden. 61 pp.nWenzel, R. N. 1936. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem.28(8):988-994.nWu, S. 1971. Calculation of interfacial tension in polymer systems. J. Polym. Sci.C34:19-30.nYork, F. W. 1975. Helical heads promise planer noise reduction. Page 249 in Modern Sawmill Techniques, v. 5, Proc. 4th Sawmill Clinic, San Francisco, CA.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.