An Analysis of Home Furnishings Retailers' Use of Furniture Markets
Keywords:Furniture markets, trade shows, retailers, promotions, factor analysis
AbstractFurniture markets, a type of trade show, are highly important to both manufacturers and retail buyers in the furniture industry. Decisions made at United States markets will determine distribution, pricing, and production of furniture products. Furniture manufacturers are thought to use markets to make fashion statements, collect information for now product offerings, and expose products to the media. However, little information regarding retailers' use of these markets is available to assist manufacturers. The present study was conducted to increase our knowledge of how United States furniture retailers utilize furniture markets. Specifically, the study used a nationwide survey to examine markets held in six cities: Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, San Francisco. High Point, NC, and Tupelo, MS. Results from more than 1.200 respondents indicate that furniture retailers have a variety of both buying and nonbuying objectives. Additionally, retailers reported varying levels of interest in the six major markets. These results have important implications for the objectives that furniture manufacturers should have for their furniture market attendance. Also, United States furniture retailer respondents report varying interest levels among the major furniture markets, thus implying that manufacturers should rethink the choice of markets at which to show their products.
Bellizzi, J. A., and D. J. Lipps. 1984. Managerial guidelines for trade show effectiveness. Ind, Marketing Mgmt., 13:49-52.nBello, D. C. 1992. Industrial buyer behavior at trade shows:implications for selling effectiveness. J. Bus. Res., 25:59-80.nBennington, R. R. 1985. Furniture marketing. Fair-child Publications. New York, NY.nBonoma, T. V. 1983. Get more out of your trade shows. Harvard Bus. Rev., 61(Jan-Feb):75-83.nBowling, P. 1992. Market Shakeout. Furniture. Retailer. (April):33-40.nBowling, P. 1944. Editorial. Home Furnish. Exec. 1(1):6.nBudiansky, S. 1994. Sharp new technology helps the woodworking industry compete. United States News World Rep. (May 30).nCavanaugh, S. 1976. Setting objectives and evaluating the effectiveness of trade shows. J. Marketing 40:100-103.nDillon, W. R., and M. Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate analysis:Methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY.nDwyer, R. F., R. H. Schurr, and S. Oh. 1987. Developing buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing 51 (April):11-27.nForbes, C. L., S. A. Sinclair, and W. G. Luppold. 1993. Wood material use in the United States furniture industry: 1990 to 1992. Forest Prod. J., 43(7/8): 59-65.nFowler, F. J., Jr. 1984. Survey research methods. Sage Publications. Inc., Beverly Hills, CA.nHair, J. F., Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black. 1992. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 3rd ed. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY.nHoward, H. 1993. Manufacturers tackling discount issue, Furniture Today. (Oct. 18):1.nKerin, R. A., and W. L. Cron. 1987. Assessing trade show functions and performance:An exploratory study. J. Marketing 51 (July):87-94.nKingslein, H., and B. J. Greber. 1993. Wood remanufacturing: Growth trends and selected characteristics identify opportunities. Forest Prod. J., 43(6):29-34.nMater, J. 1992. Marketing forest products. Miller Freeman, Inc. San Francisco. CA.nMcIntosh, J. 1994. Growth to slow. forecasters say, Furniture/Today (Dec. 26):1.nMcIntosh, J. 1995. Spending tops $45B: Furniture's rate of growth slows, Furniture/Today (Feb. 2(1):1.nMichael, J. H., and P. M. Smith. 1994. Furniture markets as promotional tools:Integrating objectives for furniture manufacturers. Forest Prod J. 44(11/12):51-54.nMichael, J. H., and P. M. Smith. 1995. Information sources used by furniture retailers: The importance of furniture markets. Forest Prod. J., 45(4):25-30.nMorgenstein. M., and H. Strongin. 1992. Modern retailing, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall. NJ.nMoriarity, R. F., and R. E. Speakman. 1984. An empirical investigation of the information sources used during the industrial buying process. J. Market. Res., (21):137-147.nNorusis, M. J. 1994. SPSS professional statistics 6.1. SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL.nSinclair, S. A. 1992. Forest products marketing. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY.nSmith, R. L., and R. J. Bush. 1995. A perceptual investigation into the adoption of timber bridges. Wood Fiber Sci. 27(2):141-154.nSmith, P. M., and C. D. West. 1994. The globalization of furniture industries, markets. J. Global Market., 7(3): 103-131.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.