Evaluation of Laminated Veneer Lumber Tensile Strength Using Optical Scanning and Combined Optical-Ultrasonic Techniques
Keywords:Optical scanning, laminated veneer lumber tensile strength, veneer, veneer defects, ultrasonic NDE, Douglas-fir veneer, nondestructive evaluation
AbstractNondestructive commercial ultrasonic grading provides laminated veneer lumber (LVL) manufacturers a means for sorting veneer based on average ultrasonic propagation time (UPT) and/or average dynamic modulus of elasticity (MOEd). However, little is known about the influence of veneer defects on strength properties of veneer and LVL. Including veneer defect and growth ring pattern measurements, obtained via optical scanning, was hypothesized to improve LVL static tensile strength (Ft) property predictions. Nondestructive and destructive testing of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) veneer and LVL was performed to evaluate improvements in LVL Ft property predictions. Various models based solely on density, optical, ultrasonic, and combined system measurements were developed for LVL property predictions. LVL static Ft was best predicted (R2 1/4 0.65) with integrated optical and ultrasonic measurements (ie combined system model), which included average defect, growth ring pattern, and MOEd measurements from the LVL material. Results suggested improved LVL Ft predictions could be achieved by integrating ultrasonic and optical systems. Additionally, the optical model, which included average defect, growth ring, and density measurements, better explained the variation in LVL static Ft values (R2 = 0.58) compared with the MOEd (R2 = 0.51) and UPT (R2 = 0.31) models.
Adobe Systems Incorporated (2008) Adobe Photoshop software. Version 5.5. San Jose, CA.nASTM (2005) D 4761-05. Standard test methods for mechanical properties of lumber and wood-base structural material. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2007) D 4442-07. Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-base material. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nBoardman BE, Senft JF, McCabe GP, Ladisch CM (1992) Colorimetric analysis in grading black walnut veneer. Wood Fiber Sci 24(1):99-107.nBodig J (2000) The process of NDE research for wood and wood composites. Pages 7-22 in Proc 12th Int Symp Nondestructive Testing of Wood, September 13-15, 2000, Sopron, Hungary. University of Western Hungary, Sopron, Hungary.nBrunner CC, Maristany AG, Butler DA, VanLeeuwen D, Funck JW (1992) An evaluation of color spaces for detecting defects in Douglas-fir veneer. Industrial Metrology 2(3/4):169-184.nBrunner CC, Shaw GB, Butler DA, Funck JW (1990) Using color in machine vision systems for wood processing. Wood Fiber Sci 22(4):413-428.nDavidson R, MacKinnon JG (1981) Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica 49(3):781-793.nDeVallance DB (2009) Non-destructive evaluation of veneer using optical scanning and ultrasonic stress wave analysis systems. PhD Dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.nFPL (1999) Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-113 USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 463 pp.nFunck JW, Brunner CC, Butler DA (1991) Softwood veneer defect detection using machine vision. Pages 113-120 in Proc Process Control/Production Management of Wood Products: Technology for the 90's Symposium. October 30 to November 1, 1990, Southeastern Section Annual Meeting, Athens, GA. Forest Products Research Society, Madison, WI.nFunck JW, Zhong Y, Butler DA, Brunner CC, Forrer JB (2003) Image segmentation algorithms applied to wood defect detection. Comput Electron Agric 41:157-179.nGerhards CC (1982) Longitudinal stress waves for lumber stress grading: Factors affecting applications: State of the art. Forest Prod J 32(2):20-25.nHunt MO, Triche MH, McCabe GP, Hoover WL (1989) Tensile properties of yellow-poplar veneer strands. Forest Prod J 39(9):31-33.nJung J (1979) Stress-wave grading techniques on veneer sheets. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-27 USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 10 pp.nJung J (1982) Properties of parallel-laminated veneer from stress-wave-tested veneers. Forest Prod J 32(7):30-35.nKoch P, Woodson GE (1968) Laminating butt-jointed, long-run southern pine veneers into long beams of uniform high strengths. Forest Prod J 18(10):45-51.nKunesh RH (1978) Using ultrasonic energy to grade veneer. Pages 275-278 in Proc 4th Symp on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, August 28-30, 1978, Vancouver, WA. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nLang EM, Bejo L, Divos F, Kovacs Z, Anderson RB (2003) Orthotropic strength and elasticity of hardwoods in relation to composite manufacture. Part III: Orthotropic elasticity of structural veneers. Wood Fiber Sci 35(2):308-320.nLebow PK, Brunner CC, Maristany AG, Butler DA (1996) Classification of wood surface features by spectral reflectance. Wood Fiber Sci 28(1):74-90.nLogan JD (2000) Machine sorting of wood veneer for structural LVL applications. Pages 67-77 in Proc 34th Int Particleboard/Composite Materials Symp, April 4-6, 2000. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.nMathworks (2009) MATLAB, Version 7.4. Natick, MA.nMcAlister RH (1976) Modulus of elasticity distribution of loblolly pine veneer as related to location within the stem and specific gravity. Forest Prod J 26(10):37-40.nMcDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics. 2nd ed. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, MD.nNIST (2007) Voluntary product standard PS 1-07, structural plywood. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, US Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD. 52 pp.nPellerin RF, Galligan WL (1973) Nondestructive method of grading wood materials. Canadian Patent No. 918286.nPellerin RF, Ross RJ (2002) Nondestructive evaluation of wood. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI. 129 pp.nPieters AR (1979) Ultrasonic energy: A new method for veneer grading. in Proc. ASCE Convention and Exposition. Preprint 3534, April 2-9, 1979, Boston, MA. 17 pp.nRasband WS (2009) ImageJ. US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. 1997-2011. (Accessed 1/15/2011). http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/'>http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/nRoss RJ, Brashaw BK, Pellerin RF (1998) Nondestructive evaluation of wood. Forest Prod J 48(1):14-19.nSAS (2007) SAS Statistical Software, Release 9.2. Copyright 2002-2007. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.nSharp DJ (1985) Non-destructive testing techniques for manufacturing LVL and predicting performance. Pages 99-108 in Proc 5th Symp Nondestructive Testing of Wood, September 9-11, 1985. Washington State University, Pullman, WA.n
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.