Life-cycle Analysis of Wood Products: Cradle-to-gate Lci of Residential Wood Building Materials
Keywords:
Life-cycle inventory, LCI, wood products, green building materials, cradle-to-gate, energy, emissionsAbstract
This study compares the cradle-to-gate total energy and major emissions for the extraction of raw materials, production, and transportation of the common wood building materials from the CORRIM 2004 reports. A life-cycle inventory produced the raw materials, including fuel resources and emission to air, water, and land for glued-laminated timbers, kiln-dried and green softwood lumber, laminated veneer lumber, softwood plywood, and oriented strandboard. Major findings from these comparisons were that the production of wood products, by the nature of the industry, uses a third of their energy consumption from renewable resources and the remainder from fossil-based, non-renewable resources when the system boundaries consider forest regeneration and harvesting, wood products and resin production, and transportation life-cycle stages. When the system boundaries are reduced to a gate-to-gate (manufacturing life-cycle stage) model for the wood products, the biomass component of the manufacturing energy increases to nearly 50% for most products and as high as 78% for lumber production from the Southeast. The manufacturing life-cycle stage consumed the most energy over all the products when resin is considered part of the production process. Extraction of log resources and transportation of raw materials for production had the least environmental impact.References
Arima, T. 1993. Carbon dioxide emission and carbon storage for building materials and construction in Japan. Wood Design Focus 4(2):9-11.nAthena Sustainable Materials Institute (ATHENA). 1993. Raw material balances, energy profiles and environmental unit factor estimates for structural wood products building materials in the context of sustainable development, March. Ottawa, Canada. 42 pp.nBoustead, I. 1999. Ecoprofiles of chemicals and polymers. SimaPro5 Life-Cycle Assessment Software Package, Educational Version 5.0.009. Plotter 12, 3821 BB Amersfoort, The Netherlands. http://www.pre.nl/simapro/default.htm. (31 May 2005).nBuchanan, A. 1993. Concrete, steel, or timber: An environmental choice. Wood Design Focus 4(2):5-8.nConsortium for Research On Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM). 2001. Research guidelines for life cycle inventories. On file University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 47 pp.nEnergy Information Administration (EIA). 2001. State electric power annual 2000 volume I, Department of Energy. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epav1/epav1_sum.html'>www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epav1/epav1_sum.html.nFava, J. A., R. Denison, B. Jones, M. S. Curran, B. Vigon, S. Selke, and J. Barnum Eds. 1991. A technical framework for life-cycle assessments. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). January. Washington, DC. 134 pp.nFranklin Associates Ltd (FAL). 2001. The Franklin U.S. LCI 98 Library. http://www.pre.nl/download/manuals/DatabaseManualFranklinUS98.pdf'>www.pre.nl/download/manuals/DatabaseManualFranklinUS98.pdf.nHershberger, S. 1996. Insights gained in applying current life cycle inventory methodology to western lumber as a competitive building material. Pp. 39-45 in Life cycle environmental impact analysis for forest products. Forest Products Society, Madison, WI. No. 7294.nInternational Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1997. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles, and framework. ISO 14040. First Edition 1997-06-15. Geneva, Switzerland. 16 pp.nInternational Organization for Standardization (ISO). 1998. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition, and inventory analysis. ISO 14041. First Edition 1998-10-01. Geneva, Switzerland. 26 pp.nJohnson, L. R., B. Lippke, J. Marshall, and J. Comnick. 2004. Forest Resources-Pacific Northwest and Southeast. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module A. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports. 84 pp.nJohnson, L. R., B. Lippke, J. Marshall, and J. Comnick. 2005. Life-cycle impacts of forest resource activities in the Pacific Northwest and the Southeast United States. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.nKline, D. E. 2004. Southeastern oriented strandboard production. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module E. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports. 75 pp.nKline, D. E. 2005. Gate-to-gate life cycle inventory of Southeast oriented strandboard production. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.nLippke, B., J. Wilson, J. Perez-Garcia, J. Bowyer, and J. Meil. 2004. CORRIM: Life-cycle environmental building materials. Forest Prod. J. 54(6):8-19.nMeil, J., B. Lippke, J. Perez-Garcia, J. Bowyer, and J. Wilson. 2004. Environmental impacts of a single family building shell—from harvest to construction. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module J. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports. 38 pp.nMilota, M. R. 2004. Softwood lumber-Pacific Northwest Region. In CORRIM Phase I Report Module B. Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports. 85 pp.nMilota, M. R., C. D. West, and I. D. Hartley 2004. Softwood lumber-Southeast Region. In CORRIM Phase I Report Module C. Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports. 73 pp.nMilota, M. R., C. D. West, and I. D. Hartley 2005. Gate-to-gate life-cycle inventory of softwood lumber production. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.nNational Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2005. Life-cycle inventory database project. http://www.nrel.gov/lci/'>www.nrel.gov/lci/.nNilsson, B. 2001. LCI for PRF and MUF laminated beams. CASCO LCA-01-06-25-BN. Sweden.nPerez-Garcia, J., B. Lippke, D. Briggs, J. Wilson, J. Bowyer, and J. Meil. 2005. The environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of construction. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.nPré Consultants (Pré). 2001. SimaPro5 life-cycle assessment software package, Educational Version 5.0.009. Plotter 12, 3821 BB Amersfoort, The Netherlands. http://www.PRe.Nl/'>www.PRe.Nl/.nPuettmann, M. E., and J. B. Wilson. 2004. Glued laminated beams - Pacific Northwest and Southeast. In CORRIM Phase I Report Module G. Life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 95 pp.nPuettmann, M. E., and J. B. Wilson. 2005. Gate-to-gate life-cycle inventory of glued-laminated timbers production. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.nRichter, K., and J. Sell. 1993. Life-cycle analysis: A useful approach to promote wood as a construction material. Wood Design Focus 4(2):14-17.nUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000. Biomass energy. In Climate change technologies. State and local climate change program. http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/'>yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/nUniqueKeyLookup/SHSU5BNJXH/$File/biomassenergy.pdf.nUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2003. Wood waste combustion in boilers 20 pp, In AP 42, Fifth Edition, Volume I Chapter 1: External combustion sources. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/index.html'>www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/index.html.nUnited States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005. What are green house gases? http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/content/Climate.html'>yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/content/Climate.html.nWatershed Media. 2001. Building with vision: Optimizing and finding alternative to wood. Vol. 2: The Wood Reduction Trilogy. Watershed Media Inc., Healdsburg, CA. http://www.watershedmedia.org'>www.watershedmedia.org.nWilson, J. B., and E. R. Dancer. 2004a. Composite Ijoists-Pacific Northwest and Southeast. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module F. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 120 pp.nWilson, J. B., and E. R. Dancer. 2004b. Laminated veneer lumber-Pacific Northwest and Southeast. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module H. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 90 pp.nWilson, J. B., and E. R. Dancer. 2005. Gate-to-gate life-cycle inventory of laminated veneer lumber. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.nWilson, J. B., and E. T. Sakimoto. 2004. Softwood Plywood Manufacturing. In CORRIM Phase I Final Report Module D. Life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://www.corrim.org/reports/. 86 pp.nWilson, J. B., and E. T. Sakimoto. 2005. Gate-to-gate life-cycle inventory of softwood plywood production. Wood Fiber Sci. In this Special Issue.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
