The Influence of Cutting Parameters on the Surface Quality of Routed Paper Birch and Surface Roughness Prediction Modeling

Authors

  • Piotr Iskra
  • Roger E. Hernández

Keywords:

Routing, surface roughness, paper birch, predictive modeling, neural network

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the routing process to better understand the machining conditions that affect surface finish. Experiments were designed to determine the impact of cutting depth, feed speed, and grain orientation of the workpiece on the surface quality of paper birch wood. Statistical analysis showed that the cutting depth did not influence surface finish. Roughness depended greatly on feed speed and grain orientation, increasing linearly as the feed speed increased. The roughest surfaces were obtained by routing against the grain between 120 and 135° grain orientation, depending on the feed speed. Two models able to predict the surface finish based on initial cutting parameters were developed and compared. Both the statistical regression and neural network models were subjected to a validation procedure in which their performance was confirmed using data that were not used for the learning process. Results indicated that the neural network system estimates the surface roughness with less error than the statistical regression model.

References

Carrano AL, Taylor JB, Young RE, Lemaster RL, Saloni DE (2004) Fuzzy knowledge-based modeling and statistical regression in abrasive wood machining. Forest Prod J 54(5):66 - 72.nCoit DW, Jackson BT, Smith AE (1998) Static neural network process models: Considerations and case studies. Int J Prod Res 36(11):2953 - 2967.nCostes J-P, Ko PL, Ji T, Decès-Petit C, Altintas Y (2004) Orthogonal cutting mechanics of maple: Modeling a solid wood-cutting process. J Wood Sci 50(1):28 - 34.nDemuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (2007) Neural network toolbox user's guide. 5th ed. The MatWorks, Inc., Natick, MA. 907 pp.nFeng CX, Wang X (2002) Development of empirical models for surface roughness prediction in finish turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(5):348 - 356.nFeng CX, Wang X (2003) Surface roughness predictive modeling: Neural networks versus regression. IIE Trans 35(1):11 - 27.nIskra P, Tanaka C (2005) The influence of wood fiber direction, feed rate, and cutting width on sound intensity during routing. Holz Roh Werkst 63(3):167 - 172.nKim KJ, Moskowitz H, Koksalan M (1996) Fuzzy versus statistical linear regression. Eur J Oper Res 92(2):417 - 434.nLawrence J, Fredrickson J (1998) BrainMaker user's guide and reference manual. 7th ed. California Scientific Software Press, Nevada City, CA.nLu C (2008) Study on prediction of surface quality in machining process. J Mater Process Technol 205(1-3):439 - 450.nMitchell PH, Lemaster RL (2002) Investigation of machine parameters on the surface quality in routing soft maple. Forest Prod J 52(6):85 - 90.nStewart HA (1969) Effect of cutting direction with respect to grain angle on the quality of machined surface, tool force components, and cutting friction coefficient. Forest Prod J 19(3):43 - 46.nStewart HA (1983) A model for predicting wood failure with respect to grain angle in orthogonal cutting. Wood Fiber Sci 15(4):317 - 325.nTaylor JB, Carrano AL, Lemaster RL (1999) Quantification of process parameters in a wood sanding operation. Forest Prod J 49(5):41 - 46.n

Downloads

Published

2009-01-29

Issue

Section

Research Contributions