Using Acoustic Analysis To Presort Warp-Prone Ponderosa Pine 2 By 4s Before Kiln-Drying
Keywords:
Green board, warp, presort, acoustic speed, rate of wave attenuation, acoustic modulus of elasticityAbstract
This study evaluated the potential of acoustic analysis as presorting criteria to identify warp-prone boards before kiln-drying. Dimension lumber, 38 by 89 mm (nominal 2 by 4 in.) and 2.44 m (8 ft) long, sawn from open-grown small-diameter ponderosa pine trees, was acoustically tested lengthwise at green condition. Three acoustic properties (acoustic speed, rate of wave attenuation, and acoustic modulus of elasticity (MOE)) were then determined through waveform analysis. Boards were then kiln-dried, and warp was measured immediately after drying and after equilibrating to about 13% equilibrium moisture content. Crook and bow measured after drying decreased as acoustic speed and acoustic MOE of green boards increased and rate of wave attenuation of green boards decreased. Twist was found to have no relationship with any acoustic properties of green 2 by 4s. The results also show a statistically significant correlation between acoustic properties of green 2 by 4s and the grade loss caused by exceeding warp limits. As the number of Structural Light Framing grade losses increased, the acoustic speed and acoustic MOE decreased significantly, whereas rate of wave attenuation increased significantly. However, no relationship was found between green board density and warp and grades lost.References
Arganbright, D. G., J. A. Venturino, and M. Gorvad. 1978. Warp reduction in young-growth ponderosa pine studs dried by different methods with top-load restraint. Forest Prod. J.28(8):47-52.nBeard, J. S., F. G. Wagner, F. W. Taylor, and R. Dan Seale. 1993. The influence of growth characteristics on warp in two structural grades of southern pine lumber. Forest Prod. J.43(6):51-56.nBlake, B. R., and G. Voorhies. 1980. Kiln drying of young growth ponderosa pine studs. Arizona Forestry Notes, School of Forestry Rep. 13. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.nDuToit, A. J. 1963. A study of the influence of compression wood on the warping of Pinus radiataD. Don. Timber. South African For. J.44:11-15.nElvery, R. H., and D. N. Nwokoye. 1970. Strength assessment of timber for glued laminated beams, Pages 105-110 in Paper II, Symp. Non-destructive Testing of Concrete and Timber. June 11-12, 1969. Institution of Civil Engineering and the British Commission for Nondestructive Testing, London, UK.nGaby, L. J. 1972. Warping in southern pine studs. Res. Pap. SE-RP-96. USDA Forest Service Southeast Forest Exp. Stn., Asheville, NC.nGerhards, C. C. 1982. Longitudinal stress waves for lumber stress grading: Factors affecting applications: State of the art. Forest Prod. J.32(2):20-25.nGlantz, S. A. 2002. Primer of biostatistics. 5th ed. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, NY.nJung, J. 1979. Stress-wave grading techniques on veneer sheets. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-27. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nKolsky, H. 1963. Stress waves in solids. Dover, New York, NY.nLee, I. D. G. 1958. A nondestructive method for measuring the elastic anisotropy of wood using ultrasonic pulse technique. J. Inst. Wood. Sci.1:43-57.nMaeglin, R. R., and R. S. Boone. 1983. An evaluation of saw-dry-rip (SDR) for manufacture of studs from small ponderosa pine logs. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-435. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nMarkstrom, D. C., C. E. Shuler, and R. M. King. 1984. Warpage of studs from young growth ponderosa pine from northern New Mexico. Res. Pap. RM-RP-257. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Range and Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, CO.nMeyers, M. A. 1994. Dynamic behavior of materials. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.nShelly, J. R., D. G. Arganbright, and M. Birnbach. 1979. Severe warp development in young-growth ponderosa pine studs. Wood Fiber Sci.11(1):50-56.nSimpson, W. T. 1991. Dry kiln operator's manual. Agric. Handb. 188. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI. 274 pp.nSimpson, W. T. 1998. Relationship between speed of sound and moisture content of red oak and hard maple during drying. Wood Fiber Sci.30(4):405-413.nSimpson, W. T. 2004. Effect of drying temperature on warp and downgrade of 2 x 4s from small-diameter ponderosa pine. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-624. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nSimpson, W. T., and D. W. Green. 2001. Effect of drying methods on warp and grade of 2 x 4s from small-diameter ponderosa pine. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-601. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nVoorhies, G. 1971. The cause of warp in young-growth ponderosa pine lumber. Arizona Forestry Notes No. 6, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.nWang, X., R. J. Ross, J. R. Erickson, J. W. Forsman, G. D. McGinnis, and R. C. DeGroot. 2000. Nondestructive methods of evaluating quality of wood in preservative-treated piles. Res. Note FPL-RN-0274. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI.nWang, X., R. J. Ross, J. A. Mattson, J. R. Erickson, J. W. Forsman, E. A Geske, and M. A. Wehr. 2001. Several nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing stiffness and MOE of small-diameter logs. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-600. USDA, Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nWang, X., R. J. Ross, J. A. Mattson, J. R. Erickson, J. W. Forsman, E. A Geske, and M. A. Wehr. 2002. Nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing modulus of elasticity and stiffness of small-diameter logs. Forest Prod. J.52(2):79-85.nWang, X., R. J. Ross, B. K. Brashaw, J. Punches, J. R. Erickson, J. W. Forsman, and R. F. Pellerin. 2004. Diameter effect on stress-wave evaluation of modulus of elasticity of logs. Wood Fiber Sci.36(3):368-377.nWu, Q., and W. Smith. 1998. Effects of elevated and hightemperature schedules on warp in southern yellow pine lumber. Forest Prod. J.48(2):52-59.nWWPA. 1998. Western lumber grading rules. Western Wood Products Association, Portland, OR.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.