Family Variation in Age Trends of Wood Density Traits in Young Coastal Douglas-Fir
Keywords:
Genetic variation, X-ray densitometry, ring density components, age affects, juvenile woodAbstract
Changes in ring density and its components with increasing distance from the pith (i.e., age trends) were examined in 15-year-old trees from 60 open-pollinated families of coastal Douglas-fir [Pseudo-tsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco]. Earlywood, latewood, and overall densities of each annual ring, obtained by X-ray densitometry of increment cores, were weighted by the area of the ring occupied by each trait, relative to the total stem cross-sectional area at breast height for the trait. Age trends in weighted values differed among traits but, with the exception of earlywood density, family variation was not detected. Weighted earlywood density (WED) steadily increased from pith to bark in some trees, while in other trees a plateau occurred at age 11 or later. Significant family differences were found in the proportion of trees reaching a plateau in WED by age 12. This proportion was under moderate genetic control (family h2 = 0.30) and was not genetically correlated with overall core density or stem growth at age 15. Although there are reasons to hypothesize that the plateau in WED is an indication of transition from juvenile to mature wood formation, this hypothesis needs to be verified in older trees.References
Abdel-Gadir, A. Y., and R. L. Krahmer. 1993a. Estimating the age of demarcation of juvenile and mature wood in Douglas-fir. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(3):242-249.nAbdel-Gadir, A. Y., and R. L. Krahmer. 1993b. Genetic variation in the age of demarcation between juvenile and mature wood in Douglas-fir. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(4):384-394.nAdams, W. T., and D. G. Joyce. 1990. Comparison of selection methods for improving volume growth in young coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 39:219-226.nBecker, W. A. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th ed. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA. 186 pp.nBendtsen, B. A., and J. Senft. 1986. Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci. 18(1):23-38.nCown, D. J. 1976. Densitometric studies on the wood of young coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. 241 pp.nCown, D. J., and M. L. Parker. 1978. Comparison of annual ring density profiles in hardwoods and softwoods by X-ray densitometry. Canadian J. Forest Res. 8:442-449.nCown, D. J., and M. L. Parker. 1979. Densitometric analysis of wood from five Douglas-fir provenances. Silvae Genetica 28:48-53.nErickson, H. D., and A. Th. Harrison. 1974. Douglas-fir wood quality studies. Part I: Effects of age and stimulated growth on wood density and anatomy. Wood Sci. Technol. 8:207-226.nGreen, H. V., and J. Worrall. 1964. Wood quality studies I. A scanning microphotometer for automatically measuring and recording certain wood characteristics. Tappi 47:419-427.nHarris, J. M., and D. V. Birt. 1972. Use of beta rays for early assessment of wood density development in provenance trials. Silvae Genetica 21:21-25.nHoag, M. L. 1988. Measurement of within-tree density variations in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) using direct scanning X-ray techniques. M.S. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 96 pp.nHoag, M. L., and M. D. McKimmy. 1988. Direct scanning X-ray densitometry of thin wood sections. Forest Prod. J. 38:23-26.nHodge, G. R., and R. C. Purnell. 1993. Genetic parameter estimates for wood density, transition age and radial growth in slash pine. Canadian J. Forest Res. 23:1881-1891.nJozsa, L. A., and H. Brix. 1989. The effects of fertilization and thinning on wood quality of a 24-year-old Douglas-fir stand. Canadian J. Forest Res. 19:1137-1145.nKanowski, P. 1985. Densitometric analysis of a large number of wood samples. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 10:145-151.nLoo, J. A., C. G. Tauer, and R. W. Mcnew. 1985. Genetic variation in the time of transition from juvenile to mature wood in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Silvae Genetica 34:14-19.nMcKimmy, M. D., and R. K. Campbell. 1982. Genetic variation in the wood density and ring width trends in coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 31:43-55.nMegraw, R. A. 1985. Douglas-fir wood properties. Pages 81-96 in C. D. Oliver, D. P. Hanley, and J. A. Johnson, eds. Proc. of the symposium, Douglas-fir: Stand management for the Future. June 1985, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.nNeter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner. 1983. Applied linear regression models. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL. 547 pp.nNicholls, J. W. P., J. D. Morris, and L. A. Pederick. 1980. Heritability estimates of density characteristics in juvenile Pinus radiata wood. Silvae Genetica 29:54-61.nPaul, B. H. 1957. Juvenile wood in conifers. USDA Forest Prod. Lab. Rep. No. 2094. 8 pp.nSAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 6 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 1028 pp.nSenft, J., M. J. Quanci, and B. A. Bendtsen. 1985. Property profile of 60-year-old Douglas-fir. Pages 17-28 in D. Robertson, ed. Proc. Technical Workshop: Juvenile Wood—What Does It Mean to Forest Management and Forest Products? October 1985, Portland, OR. Forest Products Research Society, Proceedings 47309.nSilen, R. R., and J. G. Wheat. 1979. Progressive tree improvement program in coastal Douglas-fir. J. Forestry 77:78-83.nVargas-Hernandez, J. 1990. Genetic variation of wood density components in coastal Douglas-fir and their relationships to growth rhythm. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 123 pp.nVargas-Hernandez, J., and W. T. Adams. 1991. Genetic variation of wood density components in young coastal Douglas-fir: Implications for tree breeding. Canadian J. Forest Res. 21:1801-1807.nWeisberg, S. 1985. Applied linear regression, 2nd ed. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 324 pp.nYang, K. C., C. A. Benson, and J. K. Wong. 1986. Distribution of juvenile wood in two stems of Larix laricina. Canadian J. Forest Res. 16:1041-1049.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.
