Theoretical Modeling of Bonding Characteristics and Performance of Wood Composites. Part IV. Internal Bond Strength


  • Chunping Dai
  • Changming Yu
  • Juwan Jin


Modeling, simulation, wood composites, mechanical properties, bonding, internal bond strength, density, structure


A mechanistic model was developed to predict the internal bond (IB) strength of wood composites. Based on the earlier models reported in this series, the IB model integrates the mechanisms of inter-element contact, resin distribution, and localized bond development and debonding failure. Experimental tests were also conducted, and the results compare favorably with model predictions. It was discovered that a composite product having large horizontal density variations typically realizes less than 50% of the bond strength attainable between its constituent elements. The loss of bonding strength is attributed to the premature debonding of low-density regions, and the subsequent load concentration and failure-acceleration of the higher-density regions. The model predicts IB as a function of product density, wood density, resin content, and element dimensions. The IB improves with an increase of product density, resin content, and element thickness. The relationships are monotonic and nonlinear, resulting from their interactions on the contact development or/and the resin coverage. The relationship between IB and wood density is also nonlinear and dependent upon the product density. Implications of the predictive results on fundamental understanding and optimization of wood composite bonding are discussed.


ASTM (1989) D 1037-Standard: Methods of evaluating the properties of wood-based fiber and particle panel material. Pp 167-196.nBarnes D (2001) A Model of the effect of strand length and strand thickness on the strength properties of oriented strand composites. Forest Prod J 51(2):36-46.nBrochmann J, Edwardson C, Shmulsky R (2004) Influence of resin type and flake thickness on properties of OSB. Forest Prod J 54(3):51-55.nCSA (1993) O437.1-93: Test methods for OSB and wafer-board. Pp 35-58.nCarll CG, Wang P (1983) Data for prediction of mechanical properties of aspen flakeboards. USDA Research Note FPL-0246. Forest Products Lab, Madison, WI.nChow S, Chunsi KS (1979) Adhesion strength and wood failure relationship in wood-glue bonds. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 25(2):125-131.nDai C, Steiner PR (1994) Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part III. Modelling and simulation of a random multi-layered flake mat. Wood Sci Technol 28(3): 229-239.nDai C, Steiner PR (1997) On horizontal density variations in randomly-formed short-fibre wood composite boards. Compos Part A-Appl S 28(A):57-64.nDai C, Yu C, Zhou X (2005) Heat and mass transfer in wood composite panels during hot pressing. Part 2. Modeling void formation and mat permeability. Wood Fiber Sci 37(2):242-257.nDai C, Yu C, Zhou C (2007) Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. Part I. Inter-element contact. Wood Fiber Sci 39(1):48-55.nDai C, Yu C, Groves K, Lohrasebi H (2007a) Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. Part II. Resin distribution. Wood Fiber Sci 39(1):56-70.nHe G, Yu C, Dai C (2007) Theoretical modeling of bonding characteristics and performance of wood composites. Part III. Bonding strength between two wood elements. Wood Fiber Sci 39(4):566-577.nHse CY (1975) Properties of flakeboards from hardwoods growing on southern pine sites. Forest Prod J 25(3):48-53.nHsu E (1995) Optimization of pressing parameters. Forintek Canada Corp. Technical Report, No 3812M215. 12 pp.nKelly M (1977) Critical review of relationships between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. USDA General Technical Report FPL-10. Forest Products Lab, Madison, WI.nKruse K, Dai C, Pielasch A (2000) An analysis of strand and horizontal density distributions in oriented strand board (OSB). Holz Roh-Werkst 58:270-277.nMaloney TM (1970) Resin distribution in layered particleboard. Forest Prod J 20(1):43-52.nMaloney TM (1975) Use of short-retention-time blenders with large-flake furnishes. Forest Prod J 25(5):21-29.nMeinecke E, Klauditz W (1962) Physics and technology of bonding in particle-board production. Research report of North Rhine Westfalia No. 1053. Westdeautscher Verlag, Colognne and Opladen (Translated from German by Israel Program for Scientific Translations in 1968). 81 pp.nVick CB (1999) Adhesive bonding of wood materials. In: Wood Handbook—Wood as an Engineering Material. USDA Forest Products Laboratory. Chapter 9. 24 pp.nWellons JD (1981) The adherends and their preparations for bonding. In: Adhesive Bonding of Wood and Other Structural Materials. USDA Forest Products Laboratory. 87-134.nWidsten P, Gutowski VS, Li S, Cerra T, Molenaar S, Spicer M (2006) Factors influencing timber gluability with one-part polyurethanes—studied with nine Australian species. Holzforschung 60:423-428.nWong ED, Zhang M, Wang Q, Kawai S (1999) Formation of the density profile and its effects on the properties of particleboard. Wood Sci Technol 33:327-340.nXu W, Steiner PR (1995) Rationalizing internal bond and thickness swell test specimen size. Wood Fiber Sci 27(4): 389-394.n






Research Contributions