Comparison of Three Equations for Predicting Stress Wave Velocity As A Function of Grain Angle

Authors

  • James P. Armstrong
  • David W. Patterson
  • John E. Sneckenberger

Keywords:

Nondestructive testing, Hankinson's equation, stress wave velocity, hardwood properties, softwoods

Abstract

Assessment of a nondestructive test system for detecting defects in the gluelines of edge-glued hardwood panels required development of a mathematical relationship for predicting stress wave velocity as a function of grain angle. This relationship was necessary to understand better how stress waves propagated around gaps or flaws in a glueline. In addition, the relationship was needed to assess the influence of specimen geometry upon the effectiveness of the stress wave technique.

Equations were generated by a statistical regression analysis software package and compared to Hankinson's equation. Equations were based upon measured velocity of stress waves traveling at angles between 0 and 90 degrees to the grain at 15 degree intervals in birch, black cherry, red oak, yellow-poplar, and western white pine boards. Regression analyses indicated that the best correlations were found with second order hyperbolic and parabolic equations. The two equations were compared to Hankinson's equation and to each other by using Absolute Average Error (AAE) for each equation for each species and for all species combined at each of the grain angles for which data were collected. Hankinson's equation produces the least AAE of the three equations although the hyperbolic and parabolic equations must also be considered reasonable predictors of stress wave velocity at most angles to the grain.

References

Araman, P. A., C. J. Gatchell, and H. W. Reynolds. 1982. Meeting the solid wood needs of the furniture and cabinet industries: standard-size hardwood blanks. Res. Pap. NE-494. USDA Forest Serv., Northeastern Forest Exper. Stat., Princeton, WV.nElvery, R. H., and D. N. Nwokoye. 1970. Strength assessment of timber for glued laminated beams. Paper II, Symp. Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete and Timber, Organized by the Institution of Civil Engineering and the British Commission for Nondestructive Testing. June 11-12, 1969. Inst. of Civil Eng., London, pp. 105-110.nForest Products Laboratory. 1987. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Agric. Handbook No. 72. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nGerhards, C. C. 1980. Effect of cross grain on stress waves in lumber. Res. Pap. FPL 368. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nGerhards, C. C. 1982. Longitudinal stress waves for lumber stress grading: Factors affecting applications: State of the art. Forest Prod. J. 32(2):20-25.nJung, J. 1979. Stress-wave grading techniques on veneer sheets. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-27. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nKaiserlik, J. H. 1978. Nondestructive testing methods to predict effect of degradation on wood: A critical assessment. Gen. Tech. Rept. FPL 19. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nLee, I. D. G. 1958. A nondestructive method for measuring the elastic anisotropy of wood using ultrasonic pulse technique. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 1:43-57.nMallory, J. C. 1988. Development of a method for nondestructive stress wave testing of gluelines in edge-glued wood panels. M.S.E. thesis, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV. 169 pp.nMcDonald, K. A. 1978. Lumber defect detection by ultrasonics. Res. Pap. 311. USDA Forest Serv., Forest Prod. Lab., Madison, WI.nRoss, R. J., and R. F. Pellerin. 1988. NDE of wood-based composites with longitudinal stress waves. Forest Prod. J. 38(5):39-45.nSzymani, R., and K. A. McDonald. 1981. Defect detection in lumber: state of the art. Forest Prod. J. 31(11):34-44.nWen, P. R., and N. N. Mohsenin. 1970. Application of pulse technique for determination of elastic modulus of yellow-poplar. Mater. Res. and Stand. Dec., pp. 25-27.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-28

Issue

Section

Research Contributions