Effect of Extraction on Wood Density of Western Hemlock (<i>Tsuga Heterophylla</i> (RAF.) SARG.)

Authors

  • Ryan Singleton
  • Dean S. DeBell
  • Barbara L. Gartner

Keywords:

Western hemlock, <i>Tsuga heterophylla</i>, extraction, wood density, X-ray densitometry

Abstract

Extractives can account for between 1 to 20% of the oven-dry weight of wood of various tree species and can influence wood density values appreciably. Removing these chemical deposits (extraction) in wood samples can help establish a consistent baseline for comparing wood densities where extractives are expected to differ between sample parameters. Although western hemlock is a very important timber species in the Pacific Northwest, laboratories that determine wood density may or may not remove extractives prior to density assessment. Wood density values were compared before and after extraction for 19 young-growth western hemlock samples. Extraction was performed using 95% ethyl alcohol-toluene solutions. Ring density values averaged 0.045 g/cm3 lower for extracted samples compared to unextracted samples across rings. Slightly higher amounts of extractives were found at rings near the pith; however, a general consistency in extractive content existed among samples and along the radial profile.

References

Barton, G. M. 1968. Significance of western hemlock phenolic extractives in pulping and lumber. Forest Prod. J.18(5):76-80.nClark, A., and M. A. Taras. 1969. Wood density surveys of the minor species of yellow pine in the eastern United States, II—Sand pine (P. clausa). U.S. For. Serv. Res. Pap. SE-51. 14 pp.nEvans, R. Personal communication. Feb. 24, 2002.nGartner, B. L., E. M. North, G. R. Johnson, and R. Singleton. 2002. Wood density in relation to live crown position in 34-year-old trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Can. J. For. Res.32:439-447.nHarris, J. M. 1981. Wood quality of radiata pine. NZ For. Ser. Reprint 1474. Rotorua, New Zealand. pp. 211-215.nJozsa, L. A. 1998. Basic wood properties of secondgrowth western hemlock. Forintek Canada Corp. Special Publication No. Sp-38. 51 pp.nLui, C. J., Olsen, J. R., Tian, Y., and Q. Shen. 1988. Theoretical wood densitometry: I. Mass attenuation equations and wood density models. Wood Fiber Sci.20:22-34.nMiller, R. A. 1985. Wood quality factors in loblolly pine. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA. 89 pp.nMiller, R. G., Jr. 1981. Simultaneous statistical inference. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 299 pp.nMitchell, H. L. 1963. Specific gravity variation in North American conifers. IUFRO Sect 41 Committee on Fiber Characteristics. Melbourne, Australia, Vol. 2, 15 pp.nTaras, M. A., and J. R. Saucier. 1967. Influence of extractives on specific gravity in southern pines. Forest Prod. J.17:97-99.nTechnical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI). 1987. Solvent extractives of wood and pulp. Approved by the Chemical Properties Committee of the Process and Product Quality Division, TAPPI, Atlanta, Ga. Tech. Inf. Sheet T 204 1-88.nVarem-Sanders, T. M. L., and I. D. Campbell. 1996. Dendroscan: A tree-ring width and density measurement system. Nat. Resour. Can., Can. For. Serv., North. For. Cent., Edmonton, Alberta. Spec. Rep. 10.nVoorhies, G. 1969. Specific gravity studies of younggrowth southwestern ponderosa pine. Forest Prod. J.19(6):45-46.nZobel, B. J., and J. B. Jett. 1995. Genetics of wood production. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 337 pp.nZobel, B. J., and J. P. Van Buijtenen. 1989. Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 363 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions