A Model for Viscoelastic Consolidation of Wood-Strand Mats. Part I. Structural Characterization of the Mat Via Monte Carlo Simulation

Authors

  • Elemer M. Lang
  • Michael P. Wolcott

Keywords:

Monte Carlo simulation, wood-strand mats, consolidation, hot pressing

Abstract

A procedure using Monte Carlo simulation was developed to characterize the spatial structure of randomly formed, wood-strand mats. The simulation reproduces the number of strands in the centroids of imaginary strand columns of finite size. The vertical distances between the adjacent strands and the location of the column centroid relative to the constant length of each strand are also simulated. A data base was collected on realistic mats produced from strands of constant size and non-planar geometries (i.e., random bow, cup, and twist). The procedure can be used in a model for predicting the mechanical behavior of random strand mats during consolidation.

References

American Society For Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1991. Standard practice for testing and use of a random number generator in lumber and wood products simulation. ASTM D 5124-91. ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1994a. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part 2. Modelling and simulation of a randomly-formed strand layer network. Wood Sci. Technol. 28(2): 135-146.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1994b. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part 3. Modelling the formation of multi-layered random strand mat. Wood Sci. Technol. 28(3): 229-239.nDai, C., and P. R. Steiner. 1993. Compression behavior of randomly formed wood strand mats. Wood Fiber Sci. 25(4): 349-358.nEtter, D. M. 1987. Structured Fortran for engineers and scientists, 2nd ed. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Menlo Park, CA. 519 pp.nHarless, T. E. G., F. G. Wagner, P. H. Short, R. D. Seale, P. H. Mitchell, and D. S. Ladd. 1987. A model to predict the density profile of particleboard. Wood Fiber Sci. 19(1):81-92.nLaw, A. M., and W. D. Kelton. 1991. Simulation modeling and analysis. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY., 759 pp.nSteiner, P. R., and C. Dai. 1994. Spatial structure of wood composites in relation to processing and performance characteristics. Part 1. Rationale for model development. Wood Sci. Technol. 28(1):45-51.nSuchsland, O. 1962. The density distributions in strand boards. Michigan Quart. Bull. 45(1):104-121.nSuchsland, O. and Hong Xu. 1989. A simulation of the horizontal density distribution in a strandboard. Forest. Produ. J. 39(5):29-33.nWolcott, M. P., B. Kasal, F. A. Kamke, and D. A. Dillard. 1989a. Modeling wood as a polymeric foam: An application to wood-based composite manufacture. Pages 53-61 in Proc. 3rd Joint ASCE-ASME Mechanics Conference. University of California, San Diego, La-Jolla, CA.nWolcott, M. P., B. Kasal, F. A. Kamke, and D. A. Dillard. 1989b. Testing small wood specimens in transverse compression. Wood Fiber Sci. 21(3):320-329.nWolcott, M. P., F. A. Kamke, and D. A. Dillard. 1990. Fundamentals of strandboard manufacture: Viscoelastic behavior of the wood component. Wood Fiber Sci. 22(4): 345-361.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-19

Issue

Section

Research Contributions