Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Treatment: Effect on Permeability of Douglas-Fir Heartwood
Keywords:
Permeability, supercritical fluids, Douglas-firAbstract
The effect of supercritical fluid treatment on superficial gas permeability of Douglas-fir was investigated by using carbon dioxide either alone or amended with methanol. Permeability increased in a majority of samples, although nearly one-third of the specimens declined in permeability. Improvements in permeability appeared to be unrelated to variations in temperature, pressure, or the presence of a cosolvent, suggesting that the conditions were uniformly suitable for extractive solubilization. Decreased permeability may reflect redeposition of solubilized extractives to positions where they again diminish permeability as conditions drop out of the critical range, a possibility that will be studied further.References
Anderson, A. B., and W. B. Fearing, Jr. 1960. Solvent seasoning of tanoak. Forest Prod. J. 10(5):234-238.nComstock, G. L. 1967. Longitudinal permeability of wood to gases and non-swelling liquids. Forest Prod. J. 17(10):41-46.nCôté, W. A., Jr. 1963. Structural factors affecting the permeability of wood. J. Polymer Sci. (Part C) 2:231-242.nDobbs, J. M., J. M. Wong, and K. P. Johnston. 1986. Nonpolar co-solvents for solubility enhancement in supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 31: 303-308.nEckert, C. A., J. G. Van Alsten, and T. Stoicos. 1986. Supercritical fluid processing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20(4):319.nFroment, H. A. 1981. U. S. Patnet 43088200. Dec. 28, 1981.nJohnston, K. P., D. G. Peck, and S. Kim. 1989. Modeling supercritical mixtures: How predictive is it? Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 28:1115-1125.nKrahmer, R. L. 1961. Anatomical features of permeable and refractory Douglas-fir. Forest Prod. J. 11:439-441.nLi, L., and E. Kiran. 1988. Interaction of supercritical fluids with lignocellulosic materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27:1301-1312.nMcDonald, E. C., J. Howard, and B. Bennett. 1983. Chemicals from forest products by critical fluids extraction. Fluid Phase Equilib. 10(2-3):337-344.nMcHugh, M. A., and V. J. Krukonis. 1986. Supercritical fluid extraction: Principles and practice. Butter-worths. Boston, MA.nMiller, D. J. 1961. Permeability of Douglas-fir in Oregon. Forest Prod. J. 11(1):14-16.nNaryanappa, D., and S. N. Sharma. 1990. Longitudinal gas permeability of refractory Casuarina equisetifolia as affected by steaming and ponding treatments. J. Indian Acad. Wood Sci. 21(1):5-11.nNicholas, D. D., and R. J. Thomas. 1968. Influence of steaming on ultrastructure of bordered pit membranes in loblolly pine. Forest Prod. J. 19(1):57-59.nPaulaitis, M. E., V. J. Krukonis, R. T. Kurnik, and R. C. Reid. 1982. Supercritical fluid extraction. Rev. Chem. Engr. 1(2): 179.nPuri, V. P., and H. Mamers. 1983. Explosive pretreatment of lignocellulosic residue with pressure carbon dioxide for the production of fermentation extracts. Biocng. Technol. 25:3149-3161.nRitter, D. C., and A. G. Campbell. 1991. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of southern pine and ponderosa pine. Wood Fiber Sci. 23:98-113.nSiau, J. F. 1971. Flow in wood. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.nSiau, J. F. 1984. Transport processes in wood. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.nStamm, A. J. 1932. Effect of chemical treatment upon permeability of wood. Ind. Eng. Chem. 24:51-52.nStamm, A. J. 1963. Permeability of wood to fluid. Forest Prod. J. 13:503-507.nSteel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.nThomas, R. J., and D. D. Nicholas. 1966. Pit membrane structure on loblolly pine as influenced by solvent exchange drying. Forest Prod. J. 16(3):53-56.nVan Alsten, J. G. 1986. Structural and functional effects in solutions with pure and entrained-doped supercritical solvent. Ph.D. dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.nWilliams, D. F. 1981. Extraction with supercritical gases. Chem. Eng. Sci. 36:1769-1788.n
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of an article published in Wood and Fiber Science is transferred to the Society of Wood Science and Technology (for U. S. Government employees: to the extent transferable), effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. This transfer grants the Society of Wood Science and Technology permission to republish all or any part of the article in any form, e.g., reprints for sale, microfiche, proceedings, etc. However, the authors reserve the following as set forth in the Copyright Law:
1. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
2. The right to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or part of the article or translations thereof. In the case of whole articles, such third parties must obtain Society of Wood Science and Technology written permission as well. However, the Society may grant rights with respect to Journal issues as a whole.
3. The right to use all or part of this article in future works of their own, such as lectures, press releases, reviews, text books, or reprint books.