Effect of Bordered Pit Torus Position on Permeability in Chinese Yezo Spruce


  • Fucheng Bao
  • Jianxiong Lu
  • Youke Zhao


Chinese yezo spruce, bordered pit torus, pit aspiration, pit in unaspirated position, pit deaspiration, permeability


The effect of different bordered pit torus positions on wood permeability was studied by air-drying and ethanol-exchange drying for green wood and by soaking in water, then followed by ethanol-exchange drying for air-dried wood of Chinese yezo spruce (Picea jezoensis var. komarovii). The results showed that different treatments caused different pit torus positions and different wood permeability. The air-drying treatment resulted in pit torus aspiration and low permeability for sapwood. The ethanol-exchange drying treatment left the pit torus in an unaspirated position and resulted in high permeability for sapwood. Soaking in water followed by ethanol-exchange drying caused deaspiration of a part of pit torus and increased permeability for both sapwood and heartwood.


Bao, F., J. Lu, and S. Avramidis. 1999. On the permeability of main wood species in China. Holfzforschung53(4):350-354.nBolton, A. J., and J. A. Petty. 1977. Influence of critical point and solvent exchange drying on gas permeability of conifer sapwood. Wood Science9(4):187-193.nBramhall, G., and J. W. Wilson. 1971. Axial gas permeability of Douglas fir microsections dried by various techniques. Wood Science3(4):223-230.nComstock, G. L., and W. A. Côté. 1968. Factors affecting permeability and pit aspiration in coniferous sapwood. Wood Sci. Technol.2(4):279-291.nCôté, W. A. 1963. Structural factors affecting the permeability of wood. J. Polym Sci. Part C1(2):231-242.nErickson, H. D. and R. J. Crawford. 1959. The effect of several seasoning methods on the permeability of wood to liquids. Am. Wood Preserv. Assoc. Proc. 210-220.nJiang, X., F. Bao, and J. Lu. 1993. Microscope and ultra-structure and the relation with their permeability of two refractory species. Forestry Sci.29(4):331-337 (in Chinese).nLiese, W., and J. Bauch. 1967. On anatomical causes of refractory behaviour of spruce and Douglas fir. J. Inst. Wood Sci.19:3-14.nLin, J. X. 1989. Distribution, size, and effective aperture area of the inter-tracheid pits in the radial wall of Pinus radiata tracheids. IAWA10(1):53-58.nLu, J., and F. Bao. 1992. Preliminary exploration on the effect of deaspiration of aspirated pit on the wood permeability of Picea jezoensis var. komarovii. Wood Industry6(1):29-33 (in Chinese).nNicholas, D. D. 1973. Wood deterioration and its prevention by preservative treatment, vol. 2. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY. pp. 299-343.nPetty, J. A. 1978. Effects of solvent-exchange drying and filtration on the absorption of petroleum distillate by spruce wood. Holzforschung32(2):52-55.nSiau, J. F. 1981. Flow in wood. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY. 131 pp.nSiau, J. F. 1995. Wood: Influence of moisture on physical properties. Dept. of Wood Science and Wood Products, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. 227 pp.nThomas, R. J., and K. P. Kringstad. 1971. The role of hydrogen bonding in pit aspiration. Holzforschung25(5):143-149.nThomas, R. J., and D. D. Nicholas. 1966. Pit membrane structure in loblolly pine as influenced by solvent exchange drying. Forest Prod. J.16(3):53-56.n






Research Contributions