Diffusion and Sorption of the Fumigant Methylisothiocyanate in Douglas-Fir Wood

Authors

  • Andrew R. Zahora
  • Jeffrey J. Morrell

Keywords:

Methylisothiocyanate, fumigants, diffusion, adsorption, desorption, Douglas-fir

Abstract

The influence of moisture content (MC) and conventional preservative treatment on methyliso-thiocyanate (MIT) sorption and diffusion were investigated in Douglas-fir wood. In wood at 0% MC, the ratio of equilibrium MIT adsorption to desorption concentrations was low (0.2), but it increased rapidly to about 0.94 above 18% MC. Partition coefficients (bound/vapor MIT) for MIT adsorption to wood increased with wood moisture from 0% to about 12%. At higher moisture contents, sorbed water apparently interfered with MIT sorption, and partition coefficients decreased with wood moisture content for both MIT adsorption and desorption.

Steady-state diffusion coefficients were dependent on wood moisture content, but were at least 200 times higher for longitudinal movement of MIT in Douglas-fir heartwood than for transverse movement. Diffusion coefficients increased with wood moisture content below the fiber-saturation point, apparently as a result of improved bound MIT diffusion. Increasing wood moisture content from 22% to 80% reduced longitudinal MIT diffusion almost threefold, but did not greatly influence tangential MIT diffusion. Radial movement of MIT was about seven times faster in Douglas-fir sapwood than in heartwood. Preservative treatment with waterborne chromated copper arsenate did not influence MIT sorption or diffusion in sapwood at 15% MC, but impregnation with P-9 Type A oil restricted MIT movement and may provide a barrier to fumigant loss.

References

Daniel, G., and T. Nilsson. 1987. Comparative studies on the distribution of lignin and CCA elements in birch using electron microscopic X-ray microanalysis. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. IRG/WP/1328.nGoodell, B. S., and R. D. Graham. 1983. A survey of methods used to detect and control fungal decay of wood poles in service. Int. J. Wood Preserv. 3(2):61-63.nHelsing, G. G., J. Morrell, and R. D. Graham. 1984. Evaluation of fumigants for control of internal decay in pressure-treated Douglas-fir poles and piles. Holzforschung 27:168-173.nKrahmer, R. L. 1961. Anatomical features of permeable and refractory Douglas-fir. For. Prod. J. 11(9):439-441.nMorrell, J. J., and M. E. Corden. 1986. Conserving energy by safe and environmentally acceptable practices in maintaining and procuring transmission poles for long service. Sixth Annual Report. Cooperative Pole Research Program. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.nRowell, R. M. 1983. Chemical modification of wood. For. Prod. Abstr. 6(12):363-382.nSiau, J. F. 1984. Transport processes in wood. Springer Series in Wood Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.nSkaar, C. 1972. Water in wood. Syracuse Wood Science Series. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY.nSpalt, H. A. 1958. The fundamentals of water vapor sorption by wood. For. Prod. J. 8(10):288-295.nWinston, P. W., and D. H. Bates. 1960. Saturated solutions for the control of humidity in biological research. Ecology 41(1):232-237.nZahora, A. R., and J. J. Morrell. 1988. A note on the sensitivity of a closed-tube bioassay to volatile methylisothiocyanate residues in fumigant-treated wood. Wood Fiber Sci. 20(1):91-96.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-22

Issue

Section

Research Contributions