Within-Stem Variation in Wood Properties of Red Pine (<i>Pinus Resinosa</i> AIT.)

Authors

  • Cheng Zhou
  • Ying-Hei Chui
  • Meng Gong

Keywords:

Red pine, specific gravity, tensile strength parallel-to-grain, tensile strength perpendicular-to-grain, shear strength parallel-to-grain, within-stem variation

Abstract

Some physical and mechanical properties, including tension parallel-to-grain, tension perpendicular-to-grain, and shear parallel-to-grain, and their variations within the tree stem of red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) were evaluated in this study. All these wood properties were obtained based on small clear specimens. Results indicate that wood properties tended to increase from pith to bark in the radial direction and decrease from bottom to top in the longitudinal direction. These variations in wood properties can be mainly attributed to the differences in wood characteristics of juvenile and mature wood. The influence of growth ring orientation was not statistically significant on shear strength parallel-to-grain and tensile strength perpendicular-to-grain. Information on variation in mechanical properties of wood across a tree stem is essential to investigate the influence of sawing pattern on mechanical properties of lumber products.

References

Alkan S (1990) Variation of some properties of a red pine. MS thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada. 109 pp.nASTM (2007a) D 4442-07. Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-based materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2007b) D 2395-07a. Standard test methods for specific gravity of wood and wood-based materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nASTM (2009) D 143-09. Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nBaker G (1967) Estimating specific gravity of plantation grown red pine. Forest Prod J 17(1):21-24.nBendtsen BA, Senft J (1986) Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of planation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood Fiber Sci 18(1):23-38.nDeresse T (1998) The influence of age and growth rate on selected properties of Maine-grown red pine. PhD diss., University of Maine, Orono, ME. 178 pp.nDoyle DV, Drow JT (1946) The elastic properties of wood—Young's moduli, moduli of rigidity, and Poisson's ratios of Mahogany and Khaya. FPL Rep 1528C. USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 7 pp.nFPL (2010) Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-190 USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 508 pp.nKaya F, Smith I (1993) Variation in crushing strength and some related properties of a red pine. Wood Sci Technol 27(3):229-239.nKellogg RM, Ifju G (1962) Influence of specific gravity and certain other factors on the tensile properties of wood. Forest Prod J 12(10):463-470.nKennedy RW (1995) Coniferous wood quality in the future: Concerns and strategies. Wood Sci Technol 29(5):321-338.nLarson PR, Kretschmann DE, Clark AI, Isebrands JG (2001) Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines: A synopsis. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-129. USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI. 42 pp.nLoo JA, Tauer CG, McNew RW (1985) Genetic variation in the time transition from juvenile to mature wood in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Silvae Genet 34(1):14-19.nMachado JS, Cruz HP (2005) Within stem variation of Maritime Pine timber mechanical properties. Holz Roh Werkst 63(2):154-159.nMcAlister MD, Clark A (1991) Shrinkage of juvenile and mature wood of loblolly pine from three locations. Forest Prod J 42(7-8):25-28.nPalka LC (1973) Predicting the effect of specific gravity, moisture content, temperature and strain rate on the elastic properties of softwood. Wood Sci Technol 7(2):127-141.nPeterson TA (1967) Variation in radial growth patterns and specific gravity of red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.). PhD diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 214 pp.nPugel AD, Price EW, Hse CY (1989) Composites from southern pine juvenile wood. Part I. Panel fabrication and initial properties. Forest Prod J 40(1):29-33.nPugel AD, Price EW, Hse CY (1990) Composites from southern pine juvenile wood. Part II. Durability and dimensional stability. Forest Prod J 40(3):57-61.nPugel AD, Price EW, Hse CY, Shupe UF (2004) Composites from southern pine juvenile wood. Part III. Juvenile and mature wood furnish mixtures. Forest Prod J 54(1):47-52.nShepard RK, Shottafer JE (1992) Wood property-age relationships of natural and plantation-grown red pine. Tech Bull 149. Maine Agric Exp Stn, University of Maine, Orono, ME. 27 pp.nShmulsky R, Jones PD (2011) Forest products and wood science: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA. 496 pp.nShukla SR, Kamdem DP (2008) Physical and mechanical properties of red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) from three provenances. Wood Fiber Sci 40(1):103-110.nStern EG (1944) Strength properties of yellow poplar from Virginia. Bulletin Virginia Polytechnic Institute 38(2):1-36.nYeh TF, Braun JL, Goldfarb B, Chang HM, Kadla JF (2006) Morphological and chemical variations between juvenile wood, mature wood, and compression wood of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Holzforschung 60(1):1-8.nZhu JY, Scott CT, Scallon KL, Myers GC (2007) Effects of plantation density on wood density and anatomical properties of red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.). Wood Fiber Sci 39(3):502-512.nZobel BJ, van Buijtenen JP (1989) Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 363 pp.n

Downloads

Published

2012-10-15

Issue

Section

Research Contributions