Technical Note: Impact of Fertilization on Within-Tree Variability in Young Loblolly Pine (<i>Pinus Taeda</i>)


  • Gi Young Jeong
  • Audrey Zink-Sharp


Anatomical properties, fertilization, wood quality, loblolly pine


Density, ring width, and cell structure were analyzed at different sampling heights and growth ring numbers in a young loblolly pine tree (Pinus taeda) that had received multiple applications of fertilizer. Results indicated that earlywood and latewood tracheid length increased with increment of growth ring number and height, but fertilization did not appear to measurably influence cell length. As tree height increased, density decreased but latewood cell wall thickness increased. During the fertilization period, ring width and earlywood cell diameter increased, whereas density, latewood cell wall thickness, and latewood percentage decreased. Earlywood cell wall thickness did not appear to be influenced by fertilization and did not vary greatly with increment of growth ring number.


ASTM (2004) ASTM D 2395. Standard test methods for specific gravity of wood and wood-based materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standard, Section 4, Vol. 04.10 Wood. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.nBannan MW (1967) Sequential changes in rate of anticlinal division, cambial cell length, and ring width in the growth of coniferous trees. Can J Bot 45:1359-1369.nBlanche CA, Lorio PL, Sommers RA, Hodges JD, Nebeker TE (1992) Seasonal cambial growth and development of loblolly pine: Xylem formation, inner bark chemistry, resin ducts, and resin flow. For Ecol Mgmt 49:151-165.nFox TR, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ, Rubilar R, Carlson CA (2007a) Tree nutrition and forest fertilization of pine plantations in the southern United States. South J Appl For 31(1):5-11.nFox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007b) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J Forestry 105:337-347.nFranklin GL (1945) Preparation of thin sections of synthetic resins and wood composites and a new macerating method for macerating woods. Nature 155:3924-3951.nJokela EJ, Sterns-Smith SC (1993) Fertilization of established southern pine stands: Effects of single and split nitrogen treatments. South J Appl For 17(3):135-138.nKing NT, Seiler JR, Fox TR, Johnsen KH (2008) Post-fertilization physiology and growth performance of loblolly pine clones. Tree Physiol 28(5):703-711.nLarson PR, Kretschmann DE, Clark A III, Isebrands JG (2001) Juvenile wood formation and properties in southern pine. Gen Tech Rep FPL-GTR-129. USDA For Serv Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI.nLove-Myers KR, Clark A III, Schimleck LR, Jokela EJ, Daniels RF (2009) Specific gravity responses of slash and loblolly pine following mid-rotation fertilization. For Ecol Mgmt 257(12):2342-2349.nMegraw RA (1985) Wood quality factors in loblolly pine. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA. 88 pp.nMegraw RA (1986) Effect of silvicultural practices on wood quality. Pages 27-34 in Proc TAPPI research and development conference, 28 September to 1 October 1986, Raleigh, NC.nMörling T (2002) Evaluation of annual ring width and ring density development following fertilization and thinning of Scots pine. Ann Sci 59(1):29-40.nNyakuengama JG, Downes GM, Ng J (2002) Growth and wood density responses to later-age fertilizer application in Pinus radiata. IAWA J 23(4):431-448.nPosey CE (1964) The effects of fertilization upon wood properties of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) Sch. For Tech Rep 22. North Carolina State College, Raleigh, NC. 62 pp.nRojas JC (2005) Factors influencing responses of loblolly pine to fertilization. PhD diss., North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.nShupe TF, Choong ET, Stokke DD, Gibson MD (1996) Variation in cell dimensions and fibril angle for two fertilized even-aged loblolly pine plantations. Wood Fiber Sci 28:268-275.nZobel BJ, Sprague JR (1998) Juvenile wood in forest trees. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, New York, NY.n






Research Contributions