Nondestructive Evaluation of Standing Trees With a Stress Wave Method

Authors

  • Xiping Wang
  • Robert J. Ross
  • Michael McClellan
  • R. James Barbour
  • John R. Erickson
  • John W. Forsman
  • Gary D. McGinnis

Keywords:

Nondestructive evaluation, trees, stress wave, modulus of elasticity, modulus of rupture

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of a stress wave technique for evaluating wood strength and stiffness of young-growth western hemlock and Sitka spruce in standing trees. A secondary objective was to determine if the effects of silvicultural practices on wood quality can be identified using this technique. Stress wave measurements were conducted on 168 young-growth western hemlock and Sitka spruce trees. After in situ measurements, a 0.61-m-long bole section in the test span was taken from 56 felled trees to obtain small, clear wood specimens. Stress wave and static bending tests were then performed on these specimens to determine strength and stiffness. Results of this study indicate that in situ stress wave measurements could provide relatively accurate and reliable information that would enable nondestructive evaluation of wood properties in standing trees. The mean values of stress wave speed and dynamic modulus of elasticity for trees agreed with those determined from small, clear wood specimens. Statistical regression analyses revealed good correlations between stress wave properties of trees and static bending properties of small, clear wood specimens obtained from the trees. Regression models showed statistical significance at the 0.01 confidence level. Results of this study also demonstrate that the effect of silvicultural practices on wood properties can be identified with the stress wave properties of trees. This indicates that this nondestructive stress wave technique can be used to track property changes in trees and help determine how forests could be managed to meet desired wood and fiber qualities.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 1988. Standard methods for testing small clear specimens of timber. ASTM D 143. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.nAratake, S., and T. Arima. 1994. Estimation of modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elasticity (MOE) of lumber using higher natural frequency of log in pile of logs. II. Possibility of application for sugi square lumber with pith. Mokuzai Gakkaishi40(9):1003-1007.nAratake, S., T. Arima., T. Sakoda, and Y. Nakamura. 1992. Estimation of modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elasticity (MOE) of lumber using higher natural frequency of log in pile of logs. Possibility of application for sugi scaffolding board. Mokuzai Gakkaishi38(11):995-1001.nArima, T., N. Nakamura, S. Maruyama, and S. Hayamura. 1990. Natural frequency of log and lumber hit with hammer and applications for production processing, pages 527-533 in Proc. 1990 International Timber Engineering Conference; 1990 October 23-25, Tokyo, Japan. Science University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.nForest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. USDA, Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI: 463 p.p.nGreen, D. W., and K. A. McDonald. 1998. Inferences from growing trees backwards. In Timber management toward wood quality and end-product values. Proc. CTIA/IUFRO International Wood Quality Workshop, 1997 August 18-22, Quebec City, Canada.nJayne, B. A. 1959. Vibrational properties of wood as indices of quality. Forest Prod. J.9(11):413-416.nKaiserlik, J. H., and R. F. Pellerin. 1977. Stress wave attenuation as an indicator of lumber strength. Forest Prod. J.27(6):39-43.nKoizumi, A., Y. Iijima, T. Sasaki, Y. Kawai, Y. Okazaki, and H. Nakatani. 1997a. Strength properties of sugi (Cryptomeria japonia) grown in Akita Prefecture I: Young's moduli of logs. Mokuzai Gakkaishi43(1):46-51.nKoizumi, A., Y. Iijima, T. Sasaki, Y. Kawai, Y. Okazaki, and Y. Okazaki. 1997b. Strength properties of sugi (Cryptomeria japonia) grown in Akita Prefecture II: Mechanical properties of lumber. Mokuzai Gakkaishi43(2):210-214.nPellerin, R. F. 1965. A vibrational approach to nondestructive testing of structural lumber. Forest Prod. J.15(3):93-101.nRoss, R. J., and R. F. Pellerin. 1988. NDE of wood-based composites with longitudinal stress waves. Forest Prod. J.38(5):39-45.nRoss, R. J., and R. F. Pellerin., 1994. Nondestructive testing for assessing wood members in structures: A review. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-70 (Rev.) USDA, Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI: 40 pp.nRoss, R. J., R. C. De Groot, and W. J. Nelson. 1994. Technique for nondestructive evaluation of biologically degraded wood. Exper. Tech.18(5):29-32.nRoss, R. J., K. A. McDonald, D. W. Green, and K. C. Schad. 1997. Relationship between log and lumber modulus of elasticity. Forest Prod. J.47(2):89-92.nSandoz, J. L., and P. Lorin. 1994. Standing tree quality assessment using ultrasound, Pages 493-502 in Proc. First European Symposium on Nondestructive Evaluation of Wood; September 21-23, 1994, Sopron, Hungary. University of Sopron, Sopron, Hungary.nWang, X., R. J. Ross, J. R. Erickson, and J. B. Ligon. 2000. Technique for nondestructive evaluation of standing trees. Exper. Tech.24(6):27-29.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-05

Issue

Section

Research Contributions