In-Plane Dimensional Stability of Oriented Strand Panel: Effect of Processing Variables

Authors

  • Qinglin Wu

Keywords:

Flakeboard, linear expansion, modeling, stiffness, strength

Abstract

Single-layer oriented strand panels were fabricated under a combination of three alignment levels, four densities, and two resin contents. Flake orientation, density gradient across panel thickness, linear expansion (LE), and bending properties were measured. Flake orientation was characterized with the von Mises distribution using mean flake angle and concentration parameter.

It was shown that the shape of the LE-moisture content change curve varied with alignment level and test direction. The variation was attributed to whether the LE of a panel was controlled by transverse or longitudinal wood swelling along a particular test direction. Total LE from oven-dry to water-soak condition, modulus of elasticity (MOE), and modulus of rupture (MOR) varied significantly with flake orientation distribution and density. Effects of resin content at the levels used on LE, MOE, and MOR was relatively small and was more diversified. The LE, MOE, and MOR were correlated with the concentration parameter, density, resin content, and moisture content using a power form equation. The experimental data form a database of layer properties for modeling three-layer, cross-laminated oriented strandboards (OSBs) manufactured under hot pressing.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1996. Standard methods for evaluating properties of wood-based fiber and particle panel materials. ASTM D 1037-96: 137-166. Philadelphia, PA.nBryan, E. L. 1962. Dimensional stability of particleboard. Forest Prod. J. 12912): 572-576.nGeimer, R. L. 1982. Dimensional stability of flakeboards as affected by board specific gravity and flake alignment. Forest Prod. J. 32(8): 44-52.nHarris, R. A., and J. A. Johnson. 1982. Characterization of flake orientation in flakeboard by the Von Mises probability distribution. Wood Fiber 14(4): 254-266.nKelly, M. W. 1977. Critical literatures review of relationship between processing parameters and physical properties of particleboard. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-20. USDA Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI. 65 pp.nLang, E. M., and J. R. Loferski. 1995. In-plane hygroscopic expansion of plywood and oriented strandboard. Forest Prod. J. 45(4): 67-71.nSadoh, T., and G. N. Christensen. 1964. Longitudinal shrinkage of wood. Part I. Longitudinal shrinkage of thin section. Wood Sci. Technol. 1(1): 26-44.nSas Institute Inc. 1996. Sas/Stat user's guide. Version 6. Sas Institute Inc. Cary, NC. 1688 pp.nShaler, S. M. 1991. Comparing two measures of flake alignment. Wood Sci. Technol. 26: 53-61.nSpelter, H. N., D. McKeever, and I. Durak. 1997. Review of wood-based panel sector in United States and Canada. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-99. USDA Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, WI. 45 pp.nUSDA Forest Service. 1987. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. Agric. Handb. No. 72. USDA Forest Prod. Lab. Madison, Wi. 466 pp.nWu, Q., and O. Suchsland. 1996. Linear expansion and its relationship to moisture content change for commerical oriented strand boards. Forest Prod. J. 46(11/12): 79-83.nWu, Q., and O. Suchsland. 1997. Effect of moisture on the flexural properties of commercial oriented strand boards. Wood Fiber Sci. 29(1): 47-57.nXu, H., and O. Suchsland. 1991. The expansion potential: a new evaluator of the expansion behavior of wood composites. Forest Prod. J. 41(6): 39-42.nXu, W., and O. Suchsland. 1997. Linear expansion of wood composites: A model. Wood Fiber Sci. 29(3): 272-281.n

Downloads

Published

2007-06-25

Issue

Section

Research Contributions